‘3 Legged Thing’ has been a respected UK-based tripod manufacturer since 2008. It revolutionized tripods with color, and beautifully engineered components and introduced the first travel tripod in the world that could extend to over 2m tall. The prototype ‘Brian’ features in our best tripods guide thanks to its excellent build quality and portability.
Corey, which we have here with an $80 discount and being offered for a generous $119.99 (opens in new tab), is slightly smaller but a little heavier when fully extended than Brian is. This is why Brian trumped Corey to make it to our ‘best of’ list. But if a height of 59″/1.5m is tall enough for you — why wouldn’t it be as an astrophotographer — and you can deal with the 0.4lbs extra weight, the current 40% discount on Amazon (opens in new tab) means you are getting an excellent deal.
The original 3 Legged Thing’s Punks Corey (opens in new tab) has been superseded by the 3 Legged Thing Punks Corey 2.0 (opens in new tab), which costs almost double, despite having a 10% discount today.
That said, despite the upgrades of the more recent model, the 3 Legged Thing Punks Corey is not a tripod to be overlooked, don’t forget, it can fold down to just 34 cm long!
Portable/travel tripods can often feel flimsy and plasticky. Corey is anything but. The magnesium alloy feels solid and rugged; it is built to last. Not to mention, everything about it is satisfyingly tactile. The ball head, which, again, can feel cheap and loose on some entry-level models, moves beautifully and feels like it belongs on a much more premium product, as does the smooth panning and panning lock.
The 3 Legged Thinks Punks Corey has a load-to-weight ratio of 9:1 (meaning it can support loads up to 9 times its weight). With a 30 lb/14 kg payload, it is one of the strongest tripods in its class and should be able to comfortably support your best astrophotography camera with ease.
Finally, as with all 3 Legged Things products, the Corey comes with a five-year global warranty for extra peace of mind.
Be sure to check out Space.com’s Black Friday deals page, or our guide to the Best Tripods.
A PHOTOGRAPHIC exhibition aimed at capturing the special connection between Mountbatten and the Isle of Wight community has been launched.
Mountbatten and Me is a unique collection of portraits by local photographer Julian Winslow to mark 45 years of hospice care on the Island.
Anyone connected with Mountbatten could take part, including staff, patients, volunteers and supporters, and more than 1,000 images were taken, with over 300 now on display.
Nigel Hartley, Mountbatten CEO, said: “Mountbatten and Me is a tribute to everyone who is part of our Mountbatten family.
“It brings together our Hampshire and Isle of Wight communities and reflects on what living, dying and remembering means to us all.
“We live death through life, and life is full of many different experiences, which we really wanted to capture visually.
“Sometimes the stories are sad, often they can be hilarious, they can be fun, they can be full of achievement. The portraits reflect all these experiences, and we are proud to showcase them throughout our hospice building.”
Mountbatten Hospice is open to the public, and everyone is welcome to view the exhibition for free.
HOSAPETE: A tree starts with a seed. And so do aspirations. In a short span on the earth, we humans try to create happiness around us. What more than planting a sapling that will live for more than 100 years giving not just us, but our future generations, the precious oxygen. The 53-year-old Pompayya Malemath is doing just that. A wildlife photographer from Kamalapur in Vijayanagar district near the famous ruins of Hampi, Malemath has transformed a barren patch of land into an evergreen mini-forest in less than a decade.
Malemath wears different hats — a wildlife enthusiast, photographer, birdwatcher and snake rescuer. When he dreamt of creating a mini-forest in his dryland, many did not believe that he could achieve what he set out to do. But today, the same people enjoy the scenic change in the landscape, where 800 trees of 60 varieties planted in 2013 stand tall. For Malemath, the journey was not easy.
First, he had to prepare the dry land to plant the saplings. He moved large rocks and prepared the soil by adding water and organic manure. Besides enriching his small patch of land with shade-giving trees from the Western Ghats, Malemath also turned a 2.5-acre adjacent government land leased out to him by the Vijayanagar administration into a mini-forest. The green patch now attracts birds in large numbers and one important visitor is the yellow-throated bulbul. Malemath conducts bird-watching sessions, talks on herpetology and eco-tours in the mini-forest where he has set up a base camp for tourists.
Today, many nature enthusiasts visit Malemath’s mini-forest and take his advice on planting the right species on their farms. “I always dreamt of developing a green patch in the dry land here. Finally, I have fulfilled my aim. I take care of the trees like my own children,” Malemath says. But the dry, rocky region wasn’t suitable to grow large trees. “Hampi and surrounding places have many rocky patches and are not suitable to grow large trees. The annual rainfall is also less. But with dedication and constant care, I was able to grow large trees in this dryland,” he explains.
“Today, I welcome schoolchildren to the mini-forest for various activities, including bird-watching and herpetology classes. There have been several instances where snakes suddenly appear during nature programmes and students have a first-hand experience of seeing the reptiles from a close distance. Several rare bird species have been documented here,” he adds.
Shivashankar Banagar, a well-known photographer from Hampi, says Malemath is an inspiration for him and many wildlife photographers. “His efforts in creating the mini-forest are known to all. His commitment towards nature conservation is amazing,” he adds.
In this detailed technical article, I compare six AI-based noise reduction programs for the demands of astrophotography. Some can work wonders. Others can ruin your image.
Over the last two years, we have seen a spate of specialized programs introduced for removing digital noise from photos. The new generation of programs uses artificial intelligence (AI), AKA machine learning, trained on thousands of images to better distinguish unwanted noise from desirable image content.
At least that’s the promise – and for noisy but normal daytime images they do work very well.
But in astrophotography, our main subjects – stars – can look a lot like specks of pixel-level noise. How well can each program reduce noise without eliminating stars or wanted details, or introducing odd artifacts, making images worse?
To find out, I tested six of the new AI-based programs on real-world – or rather “real-sky” – astrophotos. Does one program stand out from the rest for astrophotography?
Note: All the images are full-resolution JPGs you can tap or click on to download for detailed inspection.
TL;DR Summary
The new AI-trained noise reduction programs can indeed eliminate noise better than older non-AI programs while leaving fine details untouched or even sharpening them.
Of the group tested, the winner for use on just star-filled images is a specialized program for astrophotography, NoiseXTerminator from RC-Astro.
For nightscapes and other images, Topaz DeNoise AI performed well, better than it did in earlier versions that left lots of patchy artifacts, something AI programs can be prone to.
While ON1’s new NoNoise AI 2023 performed fine, it proved slightly worse in some cases than its earlier 2022 version. Its new sharpening routine needs work.
Other new programs, notably Topaz Photo AI and Luminar’s Noiseless AI, also need improvement before they are ready to be used for the rigors of astrophotography.
For reasons explained below, I would not recommend DxO’s PureRAW2.
The three test images in Adobe Camera Raw showing the Basic settings applied.
Methodology
As described below, while some of the programs can be used as stand-alone applications, I tested them all as plug-ins for Photoshop, applying each as a smart filter applied to a developed raw file brought into Photoshop as a Camera Raw smart object.
Most of these programs state that better results might be obtainable by using the stand-alone app on original raw files. But for my personal workflow I prefer to develop the raw files with Adobe Camera Raw, then open those into Photoshop for stacking and layering, applying any further noise reduction or sharpening as non-destructive smart filters.
Many astrophotographers also choose to stack unedited original images with specialized stacking software, then apply further noise reduction and editing later in the workflow. So my workflow and test procedures reflect that.
However, the exception is DxO’s PureRAW2. It can work only on raw files as a stand-alone app, or as a plug-in from Adobe Lightroom. It does not work as a Photoshop plug-in. I tested PureRAW2 by dropping raw Canon .CR3 files onto the app, then exporting the results as raw DNG files, but with the same settings applied as with the other raw files. For the nightscape and wide-field images taken with lenses in DxO’s extensive database, I used PureRAW’s lens corrections, not Adobe’s.
As shown above, I chose three representative images:
A nightscape with star trails and a detailed foreground, at ISO 1600.
A wide-field deep-sky image at ISO 1600 with an 85mm lens, with very tiny stars.
A close-up deep-sky image taken with a telescope and at a high ISO of 3200, showing thermal noise hot pixels.
Each is a single image, not a stack of multiple images.
Before applying the noise reduction, the raw files received just basic color corrections and a contrast boost to emphasize noise all the more.
The Contenders
In the test results for the three images, I show the original raw image, plus a version with noise reduction and sharpening applied using Adobe Camera Raw’s own sliders, with luminance noise at 40, color noise at 25, and sharpening at 25.
I use this as a base comparison, as it has been the noise reduction I have long applied to images. However, ACR’s routine (also found in Adobe Lightroom) has not changed in years. It is good, but it is not AI.
The new smart AI programs should improve upon this. But do they?
Please note:
I have refrained from providing prices and explaining buying options, as frankly, some can be complex!
For those details and for trial copies, go to the software’s website by clicking on the link in the header product names below.
All programs are available for Windows and macOS. I tested the latter versions.
I have not provided tutorials on how to use the software; I have just reported on their results. For troubleshooting their use, please consult the software company in question.
ON1 NoNoise 2023’s control interface.
ON1’s main product is the Lightroom/Photoshop alternative program called ON1 Photo RAW, which is updated annually to major new versions. It has full cataloging options like Lightroom and image layering like Photoshop. Its Edit module contains the NoNoise AI routine. But NoNoise AI can be purchased as a stand-alone app that also installs as a plug-in for Lightroom and Photoshop. It’s what I tested here. The latest 2023 version of NoNoise AI added ON1’s new Tack Sharp AI sharpening routine.
Version tested: 17.0.1
Topaz DeNoise AI’s four-pane view to select the best AI model.
This program has proven very popular and has been adopted by many photographers – and astrophotographers – as an essential part of an editing workflow. It performs noise reduction only, offering a choice of five AI models. Auto modes can choose the models and settings for you based on the image content, but you can override those by adjusting the strength, sharpness, and recovery of original detail as desired.
A separate program, Topaz Sharpen AI, is specifically for image sharpening, but I did not test it here. Topaz Gigapixel AI is for image resizing.
Version tested: 3.7.0
Topaz Photo AI’s control interface for its three main functions: noise, sharpening and upscaling.
In 2022 Topaz introduced this new program which incorporates the trio of noise reduction, sharpening, and image resizing in one package. Like DeNoise, Sharpen, and Gigapixel, Photo AI works as a stand-alone app or as a plug-in for Lightroom and Photoshop. Photo AI’s Autopilot automatically detects and applies what it thinks the image needs. While it is possible to adjust settings, Photo AI offers much less control than DeNoise AI and Topaz’s other single-purpose programs.
As of this writing in November 2022, Photo AI is enjoying almost weekly updates and seems to be where Topaz is focusing its development and marketing efforts.
Version tested: 1.0.9
Luminar Neo’s Edit interface with choices of many filters and effects, including Noiseless AI.
Unlike the other noise reduction programs tested here, Luminar Neo from the software company Skylum is a full-featured image editing program, with an emphasis on one-click AI effects. One of those is the new Noiseless AI, available as an extra-cost extension to the main Neo program, either as a one-time purchase or by annual subscription. Noiseless AI cannot be purchased on its own. However, Neo with most of its extensions does work as a plug-in for Lightroom and Photoshop.
Being new, Luminar Neo is also updated frequently, with more extensions coming in the next few months.
Version tested: 1.5.0
DxO PureRAW’s simple interface with few choices for Noise Reduction settings.
Like ON1, DxO makes a full-featured alternative to Adobe’s Lightroom for cataloging and raw development called DxO PhotoLab, in version 6 as of late 2022. It contains DxO’s Prime and DeepPrime noise reduction routines. However, as with ON1, DxO has spun off just the noise reduction and lens correction parts of PhotoLab into a separate program, PureRAW2, which runs either as a stand-alone app or as a plug-in for Lightroom – but not Photoshop, as PureRAW works only on original raw files.
Unlike all the other programs, PureRAW2 offers essentially no options to adjust settings, just the option to apply, or not, lens corrections, and to choose the output format. For this testing, I applied DeepPrime and exported out to DNG files.
Version tested: 2.2
Noise Terminator’s controls allow adjusting strength and detail.
Unlike the other programs tested, NoiseXTerminator from astrophotographer Russell Croman is designed specifically for deep-sky astrophotography. It installs as a plug-in for Photoshop or Affinity Photo, but not Lightroom. It is also available under the same purchased license as a “process” for PixInsight, an advanced program popular with astrophotographers, as it is designed just for editing deep-sky images.
I tested the Photoshop plug-in version of Noise XTerminator. It receives occasional updates to both the actual plug-in and separate updates to the AI module.
Version tested: 1.1.2, AI model 2
Nightscape Test
As with the other test images, the panels show a highly magnified section of the image, indicated in the inset. I shot the image of Lake Louise in Banff, Alberta with a Canon RF15-35mm lens on a 45-megapixel Canon R5 camera at ISO 1600.
The test results on a sample nightscape.
Adobe Camera Raw’s basic noise reduction did a good job, but like all general routines it does soften the image as a by-product of smoothing out high-ISO noise.
ON1 NoNoise 2023 retained landscape detail better than ACR but softened the star trails, despite my adding sharpening. It also produced a somewhat patchy noise smoothing in the sky. This was with Luminosity backed off to 75 from the auto setting (which always cranks up the level to 100 regardless of the image) and with the Tack Sharp routine set to 40 with Micro Contrast at 0. It left a uniform pixel-level mosaic effect in the shadow areas. Despite the new Tack Sharp option, the image was softer than with last year’s NoNoise 2022 version (not shown here as it is no longer available) which produced better shadow results.
Topaz DeNoise AI did a better job than NoNoise retaining the sharp ground detail while smoothing noise, always more obvious in the sky in such images. Even so, it also produced some patchiness, with some areas showing more noise than others. This was with the Standard model set to 40 for Noise and Sharpness, and Recover Details at 75. I show the other model variations below.
Topaz Photo AI did a poor job, producing lots of noisy artifacts in the sky and an over-sharpened foreground riddled with colorful speckling. It added noise. This was with the Normal setting and the default Autopilot settings.
Noiseless AI in Luminar Neo did a decent job smoothing noise while retaining, indeed sharpening ground detail without introducing ringing or colorful edge artifacts. The sky was left with some patchiness and uneven noise smoothing. This was with the suggested Middle setting (vs Low and High) and default levels for Noise, Detail, and Sharpness. However, I do like Neo (and Skylum’s earlier Luminar AI) for adding other finishing effects to images such as Orton glows.
DxO PureRAW2 did smooth noise very well while enhancing sharpness quite a lot, almost too much, though it did not introduce obvious edge artifacts. Keep in mind it offers no chance to adjust settings, other than the mode – I used DeepPrime vs the normal Prime. Its main drawback is that in making the conversion back to a raw DNG image it altered the appearance of the image, in this case darkening the image slightly. It also made some faint star trails look wiggly!
Noise XTerminator really smoothed out the sky and did so very uniformly without doing much harm to the star trails. However, it smoothed out ground detail unacceptably, not surprising given its specialized training on stars, not terrestrial content.
Conclusion: For this image, I’d say Topaz DeNoise AI did the best, though not perfect, job.
This was surprising, as tests I did with earlier versions of DeNoise AI showed it leaving many patchy artifacts and colored edges in places. Frankly, I was put off using it. However, Topaz has improved DeNoise AI a lot.
Why it works so well, when Topaz’s newer program Photo AI works so poorly, is hard to understand. Surely they use the same AI code? Apparently not. Photo AI’s noise reduction is not the same as DeNoise AI.
Similarly, ON1’s NoNoise 2023 did a worse job than their older 2022 version. One can assume its performance will improve with updates. The issue seems to be with the new Tack Sharp addition.
NoiseXTerminator might be a good choice for reducing noise in just the sky of nightscape images. It is not suitable for foregrounds.
Wide-Field Image Test
I shot this image of Andromeda and Triangulum with an 85mm Rokinon RF lens on the 45-megapixel Canon R5 on a star tracker. Stars are now points, with small ones easily mistaken for noise. Let’s see how the programs handle such an image, zooming into a tiny section showing the galaxy Messier 33.
The test results on a sample wide-field deep-sky image.
Conclusion: The clear winner was NoiseXTerminator.
Topaz DeNoise was a respectable second place, performing better than it had done on such images in earlier versions. Even so, it did alter the appearance of faint stars which might not be desirable.
ON1 NoNoise 2023 also performed quite well, with its softening of brighter stars yet sharpening of fainter ones perhaps acceptable, even desirable for an effect.
Telescopic Deep-Sky Test
I shot this image of the NGC 7822 complex of nebulosity with a SharpStar 61mm refractor, using the red-sensitive 30-megapixel Canon Ra and with a narrowband filter to isolate the red and green light of the nebulas.
Again, the test image is a single raw image developed only to re-balance the color and boost the contrast. No dark frames were applied, so the 8-minute exposure at ISO 3200 taken on a warm night shows thermal noise as single “hot pixel” white specks.
The test results on a sample deep-sky close-up.
Adobe Camera Raw did a good job smoothing the worst of the noise, suppressing the hot pixels but only by virtue of it softening all of the image slightly at the pixel level. However, it leaves most stars intact.
ON1 NoNoise 2023 also did a good job smoothing noise while also seeming to boost contrast and structure slightly. But as in the wide-field image, it did smooth out star images a little, though somewhat photogenically, while still emphasizing the faintest stars. This was with no sharpening applied and Luminosity at 60, down from the default 100 NoNoise applies without fail. One wonders if it really is analyzing images to produce optimum settings. With no Tack Sharp sharpening applied, the results on this image with NoNoise 2023 looked identical to NoNoise 2022.
Topaz DeNoise AI did another good job smoothing noise while leaving most stars unaffected. However, the faintest stars and hot pixels were sharpened to be more visible tiny specks, perhaps too much, even with Sharpening at its lowest level of 1 in Standard mode. Low Light and Severe modes produced worse results, with lots of mottling and unevenness in the background. Unlike NoNoise, at least its Auto settings do vary from image to image, giving you some assurance it really is responding to the image content.
Topaz Photo AI again produced unusable results. Its Normal modes produced lots of mottled texture and haloed stars. Its Strong mode shown here did smooth noise better, but still left lots of uneven artifacts, as DeNoise AI did in its early days. It certainly seems like Photo AI is using old hand-me-down code from DeNoise AI.
Noiseless AI in Luminar Neo did smooth noise but unevenly, leaving lots of textured patches. Stars had grainy halos and the program increased contrast and saturation, adjustments usually best left for specific adjustment layers dedicated to the task.
DxO PureRAW2 did smooth noise very well, including wiping out the faintest specks from hot pixels, but it also wiped out the faintest stars, I think unacceptably and more than other programs like DeNoise AI. For this image, it did leave basic brightness alone, likely because it could not apply lens corrections to an image taken with unknown optics. However, it added an odd pixel-level mosaic-like effect on the sky background, again unacceptable.
Noise XTerminator did a great job smoothing random noise without affecting any stars or the nebulosity. The Detail level of 20 I used actually emphasized the faintest stars, but also the hot pixel specks. NoiseXTerminator can’t be counted on to eliminate thermal noise; that demands the application of dark frames and/or using dithering routines to shift each sub-frame image by a few pixels when autoguiding the telescope mount. Even so, Noise XTerminator is so good users might not need to take and stack as many images.
Conclusion: Again, the winner was NoiseXTerminator.
Deep-sky photographers have praised “NoiseX” for its effectiveness, either when applied early on in a PixInsight workflow or, as I do in Photoshop, as a smart filter to the base stacked image underlying other adjustment layers.
Topaz DeNoise is also a good choice as it can work well on many other types of images. But again, play with its various models and settings. Pixel peep!
ON1 NoNoise 2023 did put in a respectable performance here, and it will no doubt improve – it had been out less than a month when I ran these tests.
Based on its odd behavior and results in all three test images I would not recommend DxO’s PureRAW2. Yes, it reduces noise quite well, but it can alter tone and color in the process, and add strange pixel-level mosaic artifacts.
Comparing DxO and Topaz Options
DxO and Topaz DeNoise AI offer the most choices of AI models and strength of noise reduction. Here I compare:
Topaz DeNoise AI on the nightscape image using three of its models: Standard (which I used in the comparisons above), plus Low Light, and Severe. These show how the other models didn’t do as good a job.
The set below also compares DeNoise AI to Topaz’s other program, Photo AI, to show how poor a job it is doing in its early form. Its Strong mode does smooth noise but over-sharpens and leaves edge artifacts. Yes, Photo AI is one-click and easy to use, but produces bad results – at least on astrophotos.
Comparing DeNoise’s and Photo AI’s different model settings.
As of this writing DxO’s PureRAW2 offers the Prime and newer DeepPrime AI models – I used DeepPrime for my tests.
However, DxO’s more expensive and complete image processing program, PhotoLab 6, also offers the even newer DeepPrimeXD model, which promises to preserve or recover even more “Xtra Detail” over the DeepPrime model. As of this writing, the XD mode is not offered in PureRAW2. Perhaps that will wait for PureRAW3, no doubt a paid upgrade.
Comparing DxO’s various Prime model settings. DeepPrimeXD is only in PhotoLab 6.
The set above compares the three noise reduction models of DxO’s PhotoLab 6. DeepPrime does do a better job than Prime. DeepPrimeXD does indeed sharpen detail more, but in this example it is too sharp, showing artifacts, especially in the sky where it is adding structures and textures that are not real.
However, when used from within PhotoLab 6, the DeepPrime noise reduction becomes more usable. PhotoLab is then being used to perform all the raw image processing, so PureRAW’s alteration of color and tone is not a concern. Conversely, it can also output raw DNGs with only noise reduction and lens corrections applied, essentially performing the same tasks as PureRAW. If you have PhotoLab, you don’t need PureRAW.
Comparing AI to Older Non-AI Programs
The new generation of AI-based programs has garnered all the attention, leaving older stalwart noise reduction programs looking a little forlorn and forgotten.
Here I compare Camera Raw and two of the best AI programs, Topaz DeNoise AI and NoiseXTerminator, with two of the most respected of the “old-school” non-AI programs:
Nik Dfine2’s control interface.
Dfine2, included with the Nik Collection of plug-ins sold by DxO (shown above), and
Reduce Noise v9 sold by Neat Image (shown below).
Neat Image’s Reduce Noise control interface – the simple panel.
I tested both by using them in their automatic modes, where they analyze a section or sections of the image and adjust the noise reduction accordingly, but then apply that setting uniformly across the entire image. However, both allow manual adjustments, with Neat Image’s Reduce Noise offering a bewildering array of technical adjustments.
How do these older programs stack up to the new AI generation? Here are comparisons using the same three test images.
Comparing results with Neat Image and Nik Dfine2 on the nightscape test image.
In the nightscape image, Nik Dfine2 and Neat Image’s Reduce Noise did well, producing uniform noise reduction with no patchiness. But the results weren’t significantly better than with Adobe Camera Raw’s built-in routine. Like ACR, both non-AI programs did smooth detail in the ground, compared to DeNoise AI which sharpened the mountain details.
Comparing results with Neat Image and Nik Dfine2 on the wide-field test image.
In the tracked wide-field image, the differences were harder to distinguish. None performed up to the standard of Noise XTerminator, with both Nik Dfine2 and Neat Image softening stars a little compared to DeNoise AI.
Comparing results with Neat Image and Nik Dfine2 on the deep-sky test image.
In the telescopic deep-sky image, all programs did well, though none matched NoiseXTerminator. None eliminated the hot pixels. But Nik Dfine2 and Neat Image did leave wanted details alone and did not alter or eliminate desired content. However, they also did not eliminate noise as well as did Topaz DeNoise AI or NoiseXTerminator.
The AI technology does work!
Your Results May Vary
I should add that the nature of AI means that the results will certainly vary from image to image.
In addition, with many of these programs offering multiple models and settings for strength and sharpening, results even from the same program can be quite different. In this testing, I used either the program’s auto defaults or backed off those defaults where I thought the effect was too strong and detrimental to the image.
Software is also a constantly moving target. Updates will alter how these programs perform, and we hope for the better. For example, two days after I published this test, ON1 updated NoNoise AI to v17.0.2 with minor fixes and improvements.
And do remember I’m testing on astrophotos and pixel peeping to the extreme. Rave reviews claiming how well even the poor performers here work on “normal” images might well be valid.
This is all by way of saying, your mileage may vary!
So don’t take my word for it. Most programs (Luminar Neo is an exception) are available as free trial copies to test out on your astro-images and in your preferred workflow. Test for yourself. But do pixel peep. That’s where you’ll see the flaws.
What About Adobe?
In the race for AI supremacy, one wonders where Adobe is in the field.
In the last couple of years, Adobe has introduced several amazing and powerful “Neural Filters” into Photoshop, which work wonders with one click. And Lightroom and Camera Raw have received powerful AI-based selection and masking tools far ahead of most of the competition, with only Luminar Neo and ON1 Photo RAW coming close with similar auto-select capabilities.
Neural network Noise Reduction is coming to Photoshop. One day!
But AI noise reduction? You would think it would be a high priority.
A neural filter for Noise Reduction is on Adobe’s Wait List for development, so perhaps we will see something in the next few months from Adobe to compete with the AI offerings of Topaz, ON1, and Luminar/Skylum.
Until then we have lots of choices for third-party programs that all improve with every update. I hope this review has helped you make a choice.
About the author: Alan Dyer is an astronomy photography and author. You can find more of his work and writing at his website, The Amazing Sky. This article was also published here.
Polish illustrator and artist Pawel Kuczynski reveals our modern society in satirical illustrations. Pawel shows his illustrations without having to use any words, thus crossing the borders of language limitations. With this art, he opens up a series of questions to this world.
Here in this post, you can find 30 of the best illustrations by Pawel Kuczynski. Scroll down and inspire yourself. Please check Pawel’s Instagram for more amazing work.
MSU Extension of Midland County and cooperating parent educators sponsor the Parent’s Corner. Send submissions to Midland County MSU Extension Educator Lisa Treiber at 220 W. Ellsworth St., Midland, MI 48640.
Food Safety Q & A. MSU Extension offers a weekly 30-minute informational program about food safety topics. A short presentation will be shared focusing on the featured topic, leaving plenty of time for Q & A. The next session is “Open Sesame and Food Allergens.” Join in on this quick free presentation at 1 p.m. Monday, Nov. 28. To register, visit https://events.anr.msu.edu/FallQandA2022/
Safe Food = Healthy Kids. MSU Extension offers a free three-hour online training for childcare providers called Safe Food = Healthy Kids (SFHK). The next program will be 6-9 p.m. Monday, Nov. 28. Learn the best practices for food safety to keep the children in your care safe. Food safety education topics discussed in the class include proper cleaning and sanitizing, cooking, storing food as well as personal hygiene and more. SFHK is an approved training for Great Start to Quality, providing annual training hours. The class is facilitated by MSU Extension Food Safety Educators. To register, visit https://events.anr.msu.edu/SFHKSummerFall22/
Wealth Building Webinar. Michigan State University Extension will be offering a free webinar, 6:30-7:30 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. 29 to share information about wealth building. Participants will focus on creating a plan for savings, growing their savings and what savings products are available. They will also discuss investing, evaluating risks, goal setting, different types of investments and tips on finding a financial advisor. Come spend 60 minutes to help increase your financial awareness. There is no charge for this webinar. Pre-registration is required; to register, visit https://www.canr.msu.edu/mimoneyhealth/ click on the link “online classes” to see this course as well as other options that might be of interest. One day prior to the webinar, participants will receive an email with the Zoom link. Contact information for MSU’s Technical Support will also be provided. Registration for this class closes at 11:59 p.m. Nov. 28.
Story Hour. Come spend an hour learning about nature at Chippewa Nature Center. Youth ages 3-5 are invited with an adult, to hear a story, do crafts and other age-appropriate activities. Story Hour takes place 9:30-10:30 a.m. and 11 a.m.-12 p.m. Thursday, Dec. 1.
Creative Kids: Printmaking. Creative 360 offers a unique arts experience for children ages 5-10. Students will make art, move their bodies, get messy, make new friends and explore all aspects of creativity. Pre-register at least two days prior to the session by calling 989-837-1885 or visit www.becreative360.org. Printmaking is offered4:15-5:15 p.m. Thursday, Dec. 1. Cost is $15 per session.
The Michigan MOMsemble. Creative 360 presents a musical romp through the funny, and the frustrating moments of parenting, especially relating to the holidays. Come enjoy the high-spirited merriment of The Michigan MOMsemble, 7-9 p.m. Friday, Dec. 2 this holiday season. Cost is $12 prepay or $17 at the door. For more information, call Creative 360 at 989-837-1885 or visit www.becreative360.org.
Polar Pals. Creative 360 offers a lighted painting canvas event, 2-4:30 p.m. Dec. 3 during Holly Jolly Days weekend. Participants don’t need an artistic bone in their body. Creative 360 will provide the materials, template and instructions for everyone to paint their own version of the featured project, including a strand of 10-mini lights. All ages are welcome, children under 10 with a caregiver. Pre-register by calling 989-837-1885 or visit www.becreative360.org. Cost is $35.
Nature Art Show & Sale. Chippewa Nature Center will be hosting their Nature Art Show & Sale at 8 a.m.-5 p.m. Dec. 3. There will be nature photography, painting and woodcarving on display and for sale. Come enjoy the work of talented artists and bring your holiday shopping list to shop for that perfect gift.
Homestead Holiday Traditions. Enjoy a quiet afternoon exploring the Homestead Farm and experience holiday customs from the 1870s, at 1-2 p.m. Dec. 4. Gather around the outside fire pit and learn how many holiday traditions started with Chippewa Nature Center’s historical interpreter. There will be time at the end of the program to create a holiday craft. Meet at the Homestead Farm. This program is designed for ages 5 and up, under 18 with an adult.
Nature Play! It’s time to play outdoors at Chippewa Nature Center. Whether we’re making pies in the mud kitchen, building forts, constructing rivers, lounging in hammocks or creating nature art, this hour of play is sure to engage everyone. Come 2-4 p.m. Dec. 4, make new friends and enjoy an afternoon outdoors. Caregivers must remain with children during this program. This program is designed for ages 2-10, under 18 with an adult.
Creative Minds: Vincent Van Gogh Sunflowers. Celebrating the beauty of nature through painting brought joy and peace to Vincent Van Gogh. Taking inspiration from his style of swirling colors and brush strokes, participants will create their own cheerful flowers using acrylic, watercolor and oil pastels on canvas. This session takes place 6-8 p.m. Dec. 6 at Creative 360. Cost is $30. Pre-register by calling 989-837-1885 or visit www.becreative360.org.
Make a Spending Plan Work for You. Michigan State University Extension will be offering a free webinar, 12-1 p.m. Dec. 7 to discuss the benefits of a spending plan, identify the difference between needs and wants, and highlight the importance of an emergency fund. Pre-registration is required before Dec. 6. Visit https://www.canr.msu.edu/mimoneyhealth/ click on the link “online classes” to see this course as well as other options that might be of interest. One day prior to the webinar, participants will receive an email with the Zoom link. Contact information for MSU’s Technical Support will also be provided.
Surviving & Thriving on a Fixed Income. Michigan State University Extension will be offering a free webinar, 12-1 p.m. Dec. 8, to discuss tools to manage financial resources, planning for the unexpected, tips to increase income and spend less, setting goals and getting ahead. Pre-registration is required before Dec. 7. Visit https://www.canr.msu.edu/mimoneyhealth/ click on the link “online classes” to see this course as well as other options that might be of interest. One day prior to the webinar, participants will receive an email with the Zoom link. Contact information for MSU’s Technical Support will also be provided.
Creative Kids: Dot Painting. Creative 360 offers a unique arts experience for children ages 5-10. Students will make art, move their bodies, get messy, make new friends and explore all aspects of creativity. Pre-register at least two days prior to the session by calling 989-837-1885 or visit www.becreative360.org. Dot Painting is offered 4:15 – 5:30 p.m. Dec. Cost is $15 per session.
ServSafe®. Working at a concession stand, wanting to offer a soup supper or other food activity for your organization? MSU Extension offers this national food safety certification program. The class is designed for anyone working in the food service industry, including nonprofit organizations. MSU Extension offers an eight-hour ServSafe training and exam proctoring. Proctoring of the ServSafe Manager Certification Exam is also available by appointment for those who have been previously certified. Contact Lisa Treiber [email protected] for more information or visit https://www.canr.msu.edu/servsafe/events to find a nearby session.
The James Webb Space Telescope has compiled together instrument data that collectively reveal a molecular and chemical profile of an exoplanet atmosphere, WASP-39 b (otherwise known as Bocaprins), as we’ve never seen before!
The WASP-39 b is said to be a planet that is unlike any other, a gas-filled behemoth and “hot-Saturn” planet that resembles the size of Saturn, and orbits its star eight times closer compared with the distance that Mercury orbits our sun.
• Best Black Friday telescope deals (opens in new tab)
The above image is actually an artist’s illustration, not a digital image, but it has still been created from the combined data provided by three sensitive instruments on the James Webb Space Telescope (opens in new tab) (JWST), that include its Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam). Together these instruments have discovered many firsts in exoplanet science, detecting sulfur dioxide for the very first time in an exoplanet’s atmosphere, and therefore providing concrete evidence of photochemistry at play.
An exoplanet is a term given to a planet that resides outside of our own solar system, and this one in particular, is said to be 700 light-years away! The evidence of photochemistry is fundamental to life on Earth, and the new readings of this exoplanet WASP-39 b from Webb provide a full molecular as well as chemical profile of the planet, including fingerprints of atoms, molecules, and even signs of active chemistry and clouds. no wonder scientists are excited about these findings.
The data that has been gathered and extracted from the examination of WASP-39 b allows us to determine the atmospheric composition and constituents of the hot gas giant. Elements have been identified within the atmosphere that include water, carbon monoxide, sodium, and potassium, as well as the previously mentioned sulfur dioxide. According to NASA (opens in new tab), understanding the ratio of these elements is how scientists determine how the planet was originally formed.
• These are the best telescopes for astrophotography (opens in new tab)
(Image credit: ILLUSTRATION: NASA, ESA, CSA, Joseph Olmsted (STScI))
(opens in new tab)
The JWST initially studied this WASP-39 b exoplanet back in August, one of the first to be examined once operations had commenced, and Webb’s instruments provided the first clear evidence of carbon dioxide being present within an exoplanet. The way that we learn about a planet’s atmosphere (opens in new tab) involves breaking its varying light into separate components and creating spectra.
To perceive the light from WASP-39 b, Webb had to track the planet as it passed in front of its orbit star, which allowed for some of the star’s light to be filtered through the planet’s atmosphere. Different chemicals in an atmosphere are said to absorb different colors of starlight spectrum, which means that any missing colors in the data can inform scientists and astronomers of which molecules are present.
At upper left, data from NIRISS shows fingerprints of potassium (K), water (H2O), and carbon monoxide (CO). At upper right, data from NIRCam shows a prominent water signature. At lower left, data from NIRSpec indicates water, sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon dioxide (CO2), and carbon monoxide (CO). At lower right, additional NIRSpec data reveals all of these molecules as well as sodium (Na). (Image credit: ILLUSTRATION: NASA, ESA, CSA, Joseph Olmsted (STScI))
(opens in new tab)
The image above is a graphic created by NASA that shows four transmission spectra from three of Webb’s instruments, operating in four instrument modes. All of these spectra are plotted on a common scale extending from 0.5 to 5.5 microns.
Each of the data points (white circles) on the graphs represents the specific wavelength of light that has been/ is being blocked by the planet and absorbed by its atmosphere, appearing as peaks in the transmission spectrum.
(Image credit: ILLUSTRATION: NASA, ESA, CSA, Joseph Olmsted (STScI))
“Data like these are a game changer.” Shares astronomer Natalie Batalha, contributing to new research from the University of California, Santa Cruz. “We observed the exoplanet with multiple instruments that, together, provide a broad swath of the infrared spectrum and a panoply of chemical fingerprints inaccessible until [this mission].”
Laura Flagg, a researcher at Cornell University, shared: “We are going to be able to see the big picture of exoplanet atmospheres,” she continues, “It is incredibly exciting to know that everything is going to be rewritten. That is one of the best parts of being a scientist.”
• We recently reported on the image of a fiery space hourglass (opens in new tab) captured by the Webb, as well as a Cosmic Tarantula image (opens in new tab), and the absolutely mesmerizing Pillars of Creation image (opens in new tab).
If you want to keep up with the latest image releases, head to the James Webb Space Telescope gallery (opens in new tab), where you can see all of Webb’s first images and learn more about what they depict. NASA will be launching new images at least every other week (opens in new tab).
• You may also be interested in the best deep-space telescopes (opens in new tab), and don’t forget the best lenses for astrophotography (opens in new tab).
Canon EOS digital cameras have revolutionized photography for amateurs and professionals in many ways. Early digital cameras with LCD screens to review images meant that everyone could learn from mistakes during the shoot, and adapt their working process. As time has gone on, advances in technology have made Canon camera (opens in new tab)s so good you have to wonder if hard-learned camera skills are no longer needed.
Being old enough to remember the importance of getting the correct exposure for slide films, the flexibility and accuracy of the metering systems have taken the need to be precise away. I think this is an acceptable change – I still want to be in charge of my pictures, but I no longer feel constrained by exposure.
Using Manual exposure mode (opens in new tab), I select the shutter speed and aperture appropriate to my creative intent and let the camera determine the ISO. In effect, I am using the technology to aid my photography, rather than simply limiting me to shutter or aperture decisions.
About Canon Pro: Brian Worley
(Image credit: Brian Worley)
Brian is a freelance photographer and photo tutor, based in Oxfordshire. He has unrivaled EOS DSLR knowledge, after working for Canon for over 15 years, and is on hand to answer all the EOS and photographic queries in Canon-centric magazine PhotoPlus (opens in new tab). Visit Brian’s website (opens in new tab)
Autofocus (AF) is one of the elements that initially drew me to my first EOS camera, the EOS 650 way back in 1987. For most subjects, AF is simply better able to give me the sharp results I want. Now I just have to be sure that I understand what it identifies as subjects and, sometimes, be ready to override the automation. However, even that is getting less and less.
With all these innovations making photography more automatic, it feels like there is a point where you can take ultimate control of the most essential elements of picture-taking, composition, and lighting. Whether you hold the camera in your hands or place it on a tripod, you are choosing what is in the frame and where it’s placed.
Being free to pay more attention to the content, knowing that technology will get it in focus, and correctly exposed is a good thing. Fold-out LCDs on some EOS let the camera be placed at the optimum position for the subject, we’re not bound by the need to look through the viewfinder to check our shot.
The EOS cameras of today make us better photographers by giving us the opportunity to fully consider the subject and its position within the frame. Ensure you understand how and when the tech works, but make use of it to allow you to create your best images. It’s like the camera is a partner to help you shoot better photos.
Timing is key to composition for fast moving subjects, and EOS camera’s automation helps us achieve the results we want much quicker (Image credit: Brian Worley)
You might also like the best Canon lenses (opens in new tab) and the Canon EOS R10 review (opens in new tab).
Travellers, especially those who enjoy and appreciate the beauty of nature, frequently find train journeys in India through the country’s diverse terrains and picturesque sceneries to be mesmerising experiences. The Ministry of Railways has also joined in, sharing a few images from a train journey captured by the Twitter handle ‘The Train Story,’ which has left Twitter users speechless. The stunning images were taken from a moving train.
The Train Story’s bio describes the profile as “A Picturesque Biography. An Initiative for the Indian Railways Network.” People were drawn to the images which looked straight from a sci-fi movie. The ministry tweeted, “Magical play of light caught through the running train. PC: The Train Story ” The photos show how the light was caught through a running high-speed train.
Since being shared three days ago, the tweet has received over 900 likes and more than 470 retweets. Several users went on to respond to the amazing pictures in the comments sections.
One user wrote, “Truly beautiful, long exposure light trails are always a delight. The 3rd pic is sublime, composition is brilliant.”
Another user commented, “Looks like we travelling space with the help of hyper drive technology. It’s amazing feeling to see my nation CHANGING adopting good habits.”
The Train Story shared a similar image as a part of their initiative.
The description for the image read, “Chapter: The Train Chaser. Standing at the door, as the train departs slowly from the station, hearing the sunset’s Islamic call to prayer from far, waving to the children standing at the track one side. I once again begin my journey and this time to experience the night on the railway tracks. As the train speeds up through the city area, a different view strike my eyes and that’s the flashing of lights, just like any sci-fi movie scene. At the door, I witness the magical play of light through the moving train.”
People who are interested in photography can also try their hand at capturing some incredible moments from their journey.
Here we’ve rounded up the best cameras for astrophotography that we think will help you capture your best astro images. What’s more, many of them are, or will soon be discounted as part of the Black Friday Deals. Keep an eye on our live Black Friday Deals blog for all of the updates.
The bonus of having one of the best cameras for astrophotography is that they are typically versatile cameras that perform exceptionally for daytime shooting too. This negates the need to spend on additional equipment, something we all want to avoid with the ongoing rise in the cost of living.
Remember, it’s not all about the camera. Lenses are just as (if not more) important. That’s why we’ve laid out the best lenses for astrophotography too. We’ve also put together a guide for the best camera accessories for astrophotography and the best light pollution filters for astrophotography, especially important if you’re shooting in an area prone to skyglow.
DSLRs and mirrorless cameras have long been known for their night sky shooting prowess. Low image noise, high ISO capabilities, and flexibility for regular daytime shooting make them ideal devices for many users. However, there are also astro-specific cameras that traditional photographers often overlook. These specialized devices mount to telescopes for incredibly clear astrophotographs that can easily surpass DSLR or mirrorless cameras, although they are unsuitable for conventional photography.
Astrophotographers will need to pay close attention to the performance of each system’s noise handling, as this is a common problem for low-light and night-time photographers. Check how well the camera blocks infrared light, as this is the only way to view cosmic objects. Removing the IR filter can be done by a specialist post-purchase. Dimensions and weight are also essential factors for portability and durability, chances are you’ll be traveling to find a suitable dark sky.
Despite the common misconception, expensive doesn’t necessarily mean best (for your purpose). Some cameras cost far less but give superior astro image quality than even the most expensive models. There does always tend to be a trade-off. That might be shooting flexibility or lens mount versatility. Of course, you won’t be able to capture the stars without a sturdy tripod, so check out our guide to the best tripods for astrophotography to prepare yourself with the best possible setup.
Best cameras for astrophotography Black Friday deal:
Why you can trust Space Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.
The best cameras for astrophotography in 2022
(Image credit: Jason Parnell-Brookes)
A workhorse and detail-oriented powerhouse, this 45.4MP DSLR is possibly one of the best cameras for astro full stop
Specifications
Type: DSLR
Sensor: 45.4MP, Full-frame 35mm
Lens mount: F-mount
ISO range: 64-25600 (102400 expandable)
Viewfinder size/resolution: Optical, 0.75x mag
Video capability: 4K UHD 30FPS
Weight: 915g
Size: 146 x 124 x 78.5 mm
Memory card type: 1x SD/SDHC/SDXC and UHS-II, 1x XQD/CF Express
Reasons to buy
+
Huge stills resolution for extra detail
+
Native compatibility with F-mount lens range
+
Reliable and durable weather sealing
Reasons to avoid
–
Bigger and bulkier than mirrorless
–
Low ISO range
–
Optical viewfinder
The Nikon D850 DSLR was released almost five years ago but still keeps up with the young kids on the block, in many photography disciplines, including astro. The 45.7-megapixel image sensor on the D850 produces ultra-detailed stills photos while keeping image noise to a minimum. It even can shoot 4K UHD 30 frames per second video for those who want to make movies of the stars.
Partly due to when it was made, It is considerably heavier, bigger and bulkier than astro-specific cameras or its mirrorless competition. Still, thanks to its rugged construction and excellent weather sealing, it will last for many years, no matter what environment you choose to shoot in.
Like all DSLRs, it has an optical viewfinder, making it a little more challenging to compose and focus for night sky imaging, but the rear tilting touchscreen remedies this problem. It has two card slots for SD and XQD/CF Express cards to ensure it can record all that incredible detail at speed and for added peace of mind.
As seen on the flagship Nikon D5 (opens in new tab), the D850 utilizes full button illumination, making it simple to operate in the dark without needing a headlamp that may damage your night vision. This was one of the features we enjoyed most during our Nikon D850 review alongside its expandable ISO sensitivity range of 102400 — it practically sees in the dark. Although a very high ISO will drastically reduce image quality, it can useful just to help you compose your shot if nothing else.
(Image credit: Diana Jarvis)
(opens in new tab)
Stylish but capable, body mounted controls make for easy operation in the dark
Specifications
Type: Mirrorless
Sensor: 26.1 megapixel APS-C
Lens mount: X-mount
ISO range: 160-12800 (80-51200 expanded)
Viewfinder size/resolution: 0.5-inch, 3.69 million dots
Video capability: 4K
Weight: 607g
Size: 135 x 93 x 64 mm
Memory card type: UHS-I / UHS-II / Video Speed Class V90 *1
Reasons to buy
+
Multi-swivel screen
+
Wide ISO sensitivity range
+
Versatile for other photography types
Reasons to avoid
–
Only 26MP
–
Pricey
–
No battery charger, it needs plugging in
The X-T4 is Fujifilm’s flagship mirrorless camera and the most powerful X-series. It is an excellent option for astrophotography enthusiasts, as we discussed in our Fujifulm X-T4 review. The vari-angle screen makes composing shots much more comfortable than without, given the camera will be pointing at the sky.
The classic look of the camera makes it stylish, but the body-mounted dial controls make it easier to use in the dark if you can remember which dial does what. The 26.1MP APS-C sensor creates excellent image quality, and there are plenty of lenses available to fit this model to enhance them further.
The Fuji X-T4 uses the NP-W235 battery with a CIPA rating of around 500 shots per charge in an everyday performance mode. When we carried out our full review, we found this can be much higher when shooting in the daytime. However, when shooting the night sky, the long exposures needed sap the battery more, so expect slightly fewer.
This camera is a versatile option for photographers who regularly dabble in other styles of photography. It has a generous 6.5 stops of in-body image stabilization, excellent low-light performance, and a high-speed processing engine. That makes it ideal for action or sports photography. It is also a top choice when it comes to timelapse photography. Check out our best cameras for timelapse videos for alternative options for this style of capture.
(Image credit: Lauren Scott)
A low light beast, this camera set a precedent as one of the best astro mirrorless cameras
Specifications
Type: Mirrorless
Sensor: 24.2MP, Full-frame 35mm
Lens mount: E-mount
ISO range: 50-51200 (204800 for stills)
Viewfinder size/resolution: 0.5-inch, 2.35 million dots
Video capability: 4K UHD 30fps
Weight: 650g
Size: 126.9mm x 95.6mm x 73.7mm
Memory card type: 1x SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II compliant) 1x Multi slot for Memory
: Stick Duo/SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compliant)
Reasons to buy
+
Incredible low light video performance
+
Good battery life
+
93% AF point coverage
Reasons to avoid
–
Certainly a more expensive option
–
Low stills resolution compared to competition
–
New version now available
The Sony A7 III is a favorite among astrophotographers that like to shoot mirrorless and is one of the brightest stars of the astro camera world (pardon the pun). Though its electronic viewfinder isn’t as detailed as others we’ve listed, it still provides a beneficial exposure-ramped view to aid with composing astrophotographs. Low light autofocus detection, while not as sophisticated as some in this list, still performs well by working in -3 EV. In our Sony A7 III review, we were particularly impressed with the high dynamic range which allows you to recover amazing detail from the shadows.
Even when ramped up to a massive ISO 51200, this camera handles image noise well and produces excellent image results. For those not too worried about movie shooting (though it can capture 4K UHD at 30FPS), ISO can jump higher, expanding to an insane 204800 for stills photography.
Shooting for hours at night can drain the battery quickly, especially when you consider it has to run power both to the rear screen and the EVF. However, this camera is CIPA-rated well above average for a mirrorless of this type and can shoot 710 still shots via the rear LCD monitor. It is a touch more expensive than others in its class, but if you’re after a natural low light performer that is also versatile enough to excel in other photography styles, the A7 III might be the one for you.
(Image credit: Jacob Little)
Small but important improvements over its predecessor
Specifications
Type: Mirrorless
Sensor: BSI-CMOS 24.5MP
Lens mount: Z-mount
ISO range: 100-51200 (expanded 50-204800)
Video: 4K 60p
Weight without lens: 1.5lbs/675g
Memory card slots: 1x CFexpress/XQD, 1x UHS-II SD
Reasons to buy
+
Great for low-light shooting
+
Excellent weather sealing
Reasons to avoid
–
Not worth upgrading from the Z6
–
Lots of competition at a similar or lower price
Following the aforementioned Nikon Z6, it makes sense to talk about its successor, the Nikon Z6 II. As we discussed in our hands-on Nikon Z6 II review, there aren’t enough upgrades to warrant upgrading from one model to the other, and it’s not worth the extra cost if you’re only going to be shooting astro with it.
That said, suppose you’re upgrading from a beginner model, capturing video, and shooting other photography styles alongside astro. In that case, the Z6 II is worth considering if you can spare the extra dollars, as it is a little more refined.
Take note of everything the Z6 has, but add a second memory card slot for extra storage and peace of mind, a faster burst rate and autofocus, quicker image processing, and 60FPS at 4K video shooting.
Another inclusion astrophotographers will love is the better range of shutter speeds, allowing more control over those long exposure shots. The shutter speed limit is now 900 seconds (15 minutes).
(Image credit: Andy Hartup)
Realistic but exceptionally clear images of the night sky, and a better option for astro than the Z7
Specifications
Type: Mirrorless
Sensor: 24.5MP, Full-frame 35mm
Lens mount: Z-mount
ISO range: 100-51200 (204800 expandable)
Viewfinder size/resolution: : 0.5-inch, 3.69 million dots
Video capability: 4K UHD 30fps
Weight: 705g
Size: 134 x 100.5 x 69.5 mm
Memory card type: 1x SD/SDHC/SDXC and UHS-II, 1x XQD/CF Express
Reasons to buy
+
Low image noise
+
Superb electronic viewfinder
+
Great low light Autofocus
Reasons to avoid
–
Stills resolution not the highest
–
Limited lens range
–
Superseded by Z6 II
Though superseded a while back by the superior Nikon Z6 II, the Z6 (one-half of the first two mirrorless cameras Nikon ever produced), is still one heck of a camera and excels in low light. For our money, we think the Z6 is better for astrophotographers than its big brother, the Z7, due to the lower resolution. A lower resolution on the same full-frame image sensor means less image noise detracting from the final shot. Whats more, the Z6 is also much cheaper than the Z7.
The Electronic Viewfinder has excellent detail, with a million more dots than the aforementioned Sony A7 III, and gives a realistic, clear image. Though the Z-mount lens range is expanding, but it’s still not as established as other models in this guide. Saying this, with an FTZ adapter, you can use any of Nikon’s F-mount lenses from the past several decades, so this isn’t a problem.
Our Nikon Z6 review found that shooting even up as high as ISO 12,800 adds very little noise or softness to the image, making it perfect for low-light situations like astro and night-time photography. This is especially true if you’re trying to pick out unlit objects or scenery to give the night sky some context. The image quality only degrades a little on the maximum and expanded settings.
(Image credit: Tantse Walter)
A pleasure to compose your shot even in the darkest skies as well as a nifty timelapse function
Specifications
Type: DSLR
Sensor: 26.2MP, Full-frame 35mm
Lens mount: EF-mount
ISO range: 100-40000 (102400 expandable)
Viewfinder size/resolution: Optical, 0.71x mag
Video capability: 1920 x 1080, 60fps
Weight: 765g
Size: 144.0 x 110.5 x 74.8 mm
Memory card type: SD, SDHC or SDXC (UHS-I) card
Reasons to buy
+
4K timelapse feature
+
Handy vari-angle touchscreen display
+
A lot of camera for the money
Reasons to avoid
–
No 4K video recording
–
Only one SD memory card slot
–
Low dynamic range a shame
The Canon EOS 6D Mk 2 is an affordable DSLR for those wanting to dip their toes into astrophotography without breaking the bank. It does lack some modern features, but this is a brilliant full-frame option for its price point.
Its handy vari-angle touchscreen display makes it simple to compose the scene even if the camera is pointing skyward. For astro-shooters that like a moving image, the EOS 6D Mk 2 can shoot 4K time-lapses (in timelapse mode), making it perfect for detailed videos of the night sky, especially when paired with a slider or a star tracker. We found in our Canon EOS 6D Mk 2 review that it’s best to avoid this model if you’re planning on shooting fast action in low light, but that’s not a problem for astrophotography.
While it only captures regular video footage at full-HD 1080p, it records this at 60FPS for smooth results. Its dynamic range also leaves something to be desired, but if combined with plenty of calibration frames, this shouldn’t make much difference after image processing.
A single SD card slot might have nervous shooters biting their nails during longer sessions, but with 102400 expandable ISO and 26.2MP stills capture, you can relax knowing results will be clear and crisp every time.
(Image credit: Amazon)
A dedicated color astro camera producing stunning high resolution stills with an enormous frame rate
Specifications
Type: Color CMOS astronomy camera
Sensor: 20.1MP, 1-inch
Lens mount: Scope mounted
ISO range: N/A
Video capability: 5496 x 3672, 19 FPS
Weight: 140g
Size: 62mm diameter
Memory card type: N/A
Reasons to buy
+
Electronic shutter minimises camera movement
+
19FPS perfect for solar/lunar photography
+
USB 3.0 output
Reasons to avoid
–
Scope mounted only
–
Requires dedicated software to run
–
Images at 12 bit depth maximum
This is a compact full-color camera with its own onboard cooling system to minimize noise whilst shooting long exposures. It is one of the best-dedicated astrophotography cameras out there, the ZWO Optical ASI183MC Pro is the color version of the ZWO Optical ASI183.
In our ZWO Optical ASI183MC Pro review, we found it to represent a great choice for astrophotographers looking for a dedicated astro-imaging camera. You won’t need to bring a stack of RGB filters when heading out to shoot. It’s also much smaller and lighter than other astro cams. Still, at 1.6e read noise, it’s a serious camera.
It’s one of the more efficient camera models for astrophotography and provides a whopping 84% Quantum Efficiency peak. For an astro camera, it also has a high pixel count, at approximately 20.48MP.
It shoots an all-out frame rate of 19FPS at full resolution, which makes the ZWO Optical ASI183MC ideal for solar or lunar imaging. However, if users drop the resolution down, there’s the potential to shoot hundreds of frames a second if wanted!One downside, as with all dedicated astro cams, is that you’ll need to plug it into a computer with dedicated software to run it. A fast USB3.0 port means a healthy data transfer for the higher frame rate captures.
This camera’s design and build is very specifically geared towards clean astro shooting, as complemented by its zero amp glow
Specifications
Type: Color CMOS astronomy camera
Sensor: 9MP, 1-inch
Lens mount: Scope mounted
ISO range: N/A
Viewfinder size/resolution: N/A
Video capability: 3008 x 3008, 20FPS
Weight: 800g
Size: 78mm
Memory card type: N/A
Reasons to buy
+
Zero amp glow
+
80% quantum efficiency
+
High 20FPS frame rate
Reasons to avoid
–
No mono version
–
Square CMOS sensor unusual for some
The ZWO Optical ASI 533 Pro’s most attractive feature is likely that it has zero amp glow. Although you can remove this in editing software, this additional processing time can stack up and reduce productivity, especially when considering that you could opt for an astro camera like this and avoid it altogether. By removing the need for extra processing, you’re also keeping a cleaner, more efficient resulting image.
This camera only comes in a color version, so monochromatic enthusiasts should leave their RGB filters at home. It has a good 80% Quantum Efficiency and a quick 20FPS frame rate for those needing to shoot fast. As with almost all dedicated astro cameras, the ZWO Optical ASI 533 Pro needs an external power supply to work. A 9MP square sensor might seem a little unusual to some photographers, but it has 1.0e read noise and a 14-bit ADC for good dynamic range.
In our ZWO Optical ASI 533 Pro review, we concluded that it is a great choice for those looking for a simple-to-use, dedicated astro-imaging camera at an affordable price.
(Image credit: Andy Hartup)
While it’s an older model, it’s still a solid and reasonably priced choice for astrophotographers
Specifications
Type: Full-fram mirrorless
Sensor: 30 megapixels
Lens mount: RF (EF and EF-S with adapter)
ISO range: 100-40000
Viewfinder size/resolution: 0.5-inch OLED EVF
Video capability: 4K and 10-bit
Weight: 580g
Size: 135.8 x 98.3 x 84.4mm
Memory card type:
Reasons to buy
+
30MP sensor
+
Good value for money
+
Excellent autofocus
Reasons to avoid
–
Button layout could be better
–
Not as rugged as it’s rivals
Though four years old, Canon’s first-ever full-frame mirrorless RF system camera still holds its own against the more recent releases.
As we discussed in our Canon EOS R review, it’s neither the sleekest nor best-built body, so you’d have to be a little gentler with it than you would some of the hardier models — like the Nikon Z6 — and the layout of the buttons could be more intuitive. None of these would be reasons not to buy this model, but they could take some getting used to.
Body and build quality aside, the performance of the Canon EOS R is above average when shooting in low light. It performs especially when using long exposures, which is perfect for traditional astro shooting, including long exposures and time-lapse shooting (don’t forget your tripod). It also processes the shots very quickly with little noticeable buffer lag.
The screen is large and clear, with impressive touch functionality. Like a smartphone, you can drag and set the focus with your finger. The vari-angle touch screen also makes taking low-angle shots much more comfortable.
How we test the best cameras for astrophotography
To guarantee you’re getting honest, up-to-date recommendations on the best cameras to buy here at Space.com we make sure to put every camera through a rigorous review to fully test each product. Each camera is reviewed based on many aspects, from its construction and design, to how well it functions as an optical instrument and its performance in the field.
Each camera is carefully tested by either our expert staff or knowledgeable freelance contributors who know their subject areas in depth. This ensures fair reviewing is backed by personal, hands-on experience with each camera and is judged based on its price point, class and destined use. For example, comparing a 60MP full-frame mirrorless camera to a sleek little crop-sensor DSLR wouldn’t be appropriate, though each camera might be the best performing product in its own class.
We look at how easy each camera is to operate, whether it contains the latest up-to-date imaging technology, whether the cameras can shoot high-quality stills photos and high-resolution video and also make suggestions if a particular camera would benefit from any additional kit to give you the best viewing experience possible.
With complete editorial independence, Space.com are here to ensure you get the best buying advice on cameras, whether you should purchase an instrument or not, making our buying guides and reviews reliable and transparent.
Best cameras for astrophotography: What to look for
It can be difficult to know what to look for in the best cameras for astrophotography, but there are some crucial factors to consider to help you decide. Budget is significant, with new users who want to dabble perhaps setting aside a little less than more seasoned photographers that will only settle for the very best images. However, image clarity is critical, and you’ll find that larger sensors with fewer pixels can capture astro shots with minimal image noise. By negating the effects of image noise, we’re able to process imagery more efficiently with better-detailed results.
While not particularly useful for astrophotography, autofocus may still be helpful for those who want to combine night-time shooting with near-twilight landscapes that show the brightest stars, planets, and satellites hanging above a beautiful foreground. A low EV rating on the autofocus ability is crucial for sharp shots in the dark.
Fiddling around with one of the best headlamps can be helpful, but for those with inferior headlamps a dim-lit red light to set up your shot can be frustrating, so consider whether you need backlit illuminated buttons to help guide camera setup in the dark.
Specialist astrophotography cameras have a predisposition to warm up during long exposure shots. Suppose you’re interested in getting an astro camera that has built-in cooling to keep the performance of the image capture high, it will likely be larger and heavier, and a little noisier as the fans whir while operating.
Photographers must consider lens choice when choosing a camera for astrophotography. While most major manufacturers have excellent ranges of top-quality glass, not all camera models can accept the full range of lenses due to differences in mount types. Ideally, fast lenses with wide apertures and excellent optical sharpness and clarity are what to look for when shooting astrophotography. Pair this with a camera body that handles high ISO and image noise well and you should be ready to go.
