Over the next two weeks, the moon will be very prominent in our sky, starting as a first quarter (half moon) on Monday and becoming a full moon a week later on July 3. It will be the first full moon of the astronomical summer. Without a doubt, moonlight, especially full moonlight, louse up the skies for good stargazing and astrophotography, which are near and dear to me. Despite that, I love, love, love full moons! I call it my magic moon time.
I love the names given to full moons by various cultures worldwide. One Native American name for the July full moon is the Full Buck Moon because this is when buck deer begin sprouting new antlers. It’s also called the Thunder Moon because of the more frequent thunderstorms this time of year. My favorite name for the July full moon comes from the ancient Chinese Buddhist tradition. They called it the Hungry Ghost Moon. I am still trying to figure out why.
Whatever you call the July full moon, you can’t help but notice that it’s a low rider and doesn’t rise very high in the sky. That’s one of the reasons I love full-moon gazing this time of year. You can moon gaze for an extended time without extending your neck as much!
Not only is it nice to take in the July moon, but you can also have a lot of fun taking pictures of it. You don’t need a fancy camera; even your cell phone can do a pretty good job if you do it right. A zoom lens and exposure control can help so the image doesn’t get washed out.
You can take fantastic moon pictures through a small to moderate telescope. Hold your camera or phone over the eyepiece as steady as possible, which can be challenging. I suggest you keep hitting the shutter button or icon; hopefully, you’ll get some decent shots. If possible, rig up a tripod or something else to help steady your camera or phone over the eyepiece. You can also purchase an adapter that attaches to your telescope and eyepiece. One I recommend is the Orion SteadyPix EZ Smartphone Telescope Photo Adapter
Along with keeping the telescope steady, another essential thing is to start taking your shots through a low-magnification eyepiece with your telescope. That will have a much wider aperture than a high-magnification eyepiece. Once you get some low-magnification photos, see what you can do with a higher power.
Full moons are not my favorite to photograph through a telescope; I prefer pictures of the moon at other phases in its monthly cycle. Crescent moons, half moons, and even gibbous (football-shaped) moons are all fun to photograph. You can see more detail, especially what’s known as the terminator. That line divides the moon’s sunlit part and the part in shadow.
Once you get the photos, you can work with them a little in Photoshop or some other software, even within many smartphones, to make them look even brighter or sharper, although you shouldn’t have to do too much. You can also do some editing just with your phone. I was just amazed by the clarity. You can see details in the dark maria or plains on the moon and the mountains and craters, suitable enough to frame and hang on a wall in your home!
While you’re moon shooting or just moon gazing in the early evening eastern sky check out the low western sky. The very bright planet Venus and the much fainter Mars are in a close celestial conjunction or what I call a celestial hugging. On Friday, June 30, Mars will be just a little over three and a half degrees to the upper left of Venus. That’s about half the width of your fist at arm’s length. Just to the upper left of Mars is the moderately bright star Regulus.
Mike Lynch is an amateur astronomer and retired broadcast meteorologist for WCCO Radio in Minneapolis/St. Paul. He is the author of “Stars: a Month by Month Tour of the Constellations,” published by Adventure Publications and available at bookstores and adventurepublications.net. Mike is available for private star parties. You can contact him at [email protected].
Illuminate ATL is a nonprofit organization with a mission to increase accessibility to photography education for underserved communities in the metro Atlanta area. They believe Atlanta’s arts community should reflect its varied and distinct populations and seek to make diverse representation a reality.
Sara Keith is the Director and owner of the Atlanta School of Photography and president and co-founder of Illuminate ATL. “City Lights” producer Summer Evans spoke with Keith via Zoom about the organization.
“There’s absolutely a need for photography education in these underserved areas because you have two barriers that we were seeing…the barrier of purchasing or obtaining cameras and equipment. Photography is not a cheap hobby or creative field. Historically, one of the reasons it’s been kept from a lot of people being able to experience it is because of that threshold. But, it was also the education part of it. We could give them the cameras, but they wouldn’t know what to do with it,” said Keith.
“So we said, ‘Ok, we need to fill these two niches that we were hearing from our program partners.’ And we were already so passionate about education, and we had already done a couple of programs, just one-offs with like the Boys and Girls Club and Cool Girls. We decided to develop it into an official non-profit organization, so we launched in 2018.”
John Muir once said, “In every walk with nature, one receives far more than he seeks.” These words beautifully capture nature’s profound impact on our lives, especially when it comes to children. The benefits of immersing kids in the wonders of the natural world are far-reaching and extend beyond the evidence.
Why Should You Get Your Kids Outside?
Here are ten compelling evidence-based reasons to encourage your children to venture into the great outdoors and explore the wonders of the natural world:
Exposure to natural environments lowers cortisol levels and reduces stress. Research has shown that spending time in nature effectively lowers levels of cortisol, the hormone associated with stress. For instance, forest bathing, a practice involving immersing oneself in a forest environment, significantly decreased cortisol levels. Daily nature immersion can reduce stress levels, particularly for children facing heightened anxiety.
Nature immersion improves mood and self-esteem. Being in natural environments has increased positive emotions and boosted self-esteem. A study revealed that participants who spent time in nature reported enhanced mood and higher self-esteem than those who spent time in urban settings. This positive impact on mood and self-esteem is especially beneficial for children who struggle with self-esteem or emotional regulation.
Nature-based activities promote physical activity and healthy development. Outdoor activities like hiking, biking, and playing in the park encourage physical movement, contributing to maintaining good health. Research has shown that children who spend more time outdoors engage in higher physical activity levels, leading to better cardiovascular health and overall physical development.
Nature enhances cognitive function and problem-solving skills. Exposure to natural environments has been found to improve cognitive performance. Research revealed that interacting with nature improved attention, memory, and creativity. Furthermore, nature-based activities enhance problem-solving skills and critical thinking. Children with attention deficits show improved concentration and cognitive performance after spending time in nature.
Nature fosters a sense of respect and appreciation for the environment. Spending time in nature allows children to learn about the natural world and understand the importance of protecting it. This knowledge instills a sense of responsibility and stewardship. Nature experiences in childhood have been linked to greater environmental awareness and pro-environmental behaviors in adulthood.
Nature enhances creativity and imagination. Nature inspires children and stimulates their imagination. Research indicates that preschoolers’ exposure to nature increases creativity and imaginative play.
Nature-based activities promote social skills and cooperation. Outdoor activities involving teamwork and collaboration foster social skills and effective communication. Nature-based programs improve children’s social skills, including empathy, sharing, and cooperation.
Nature encourages independence and self-confidence. Nature-based activities often involve taking risks and exploring new environments, promoting independence and self-confidence. Outdoor play in natural environments facilitates the development of self-confidence and independence in children.
Nature promotes a sense of adventure and exploration. Outdoor activities provide children with opportunities to explore and discover new environments, cultivating a sense of adventure and curiosity.
Nature strengthens parent-child attachment and promotes family bonding. Engaging in nature-based activities creates shared experiences and memories that reinforce the parent-child relationship. When parents and children spend time in nature, they can connect meaningfully. This shared experience promotes a sense of closeness and trust, which is essential for building healthy attachments.
How Do We Get Our Kids Outside?
With these ten convincing reasons to get your kids outside to explore the natural world, consider these practical ways to incorporate more nature experiences into children’s lives:
Schedule regular outdoor outings. Set aside dedicated time each week for outdoor activities such as hikes, nature walks, or visits to local parks. Make it a priority in your family’s schedule.
Plan nature-themed family vacations. Choose destinations that offer opportunities for outdoor adventures, such as camping trips, beach vacations, or visits to national parks. Immerse your family in the beauty of nature during these memorable getaways.
Join nature-based organizations and clubs. Look for local nature-based organizations, clubs, or community programs offering children’s activities and events. These can include nature camps, hiking groups, or wildlife conservation initiatives.
Incorporate nature into daily routines. Find ways to integrate nature into your everyday life. Walk or bike to nearby destinations instead of driving, have meals outside, or designate specific times for unstructured play in natural settings.
Use technology for nature exploration. Use apps, websites, or online resources to identify plants, birds, or wildlife species during outdoor adventures.
Encourage nature-inspired hobbies. Support your child’s interests in nature-related hobbies such as photography, painting, or nature journaling. These activities allow them to express their creativity while deepening their connection to the natural world.
Organize nature scavenger hunts. Create scavenger hunts or nature-themed challenges encouraging children to observe and interact with the environment. These activities can be done in local parks or even in your neighborhood.
Be a role model. Set an example by demonstrating your love for nature and spending time outdoors. Show enthusiasm and curiosity about the natural world and involve your children in nature-related activities or hobbies.
Pursuing Wild Delight
Amid a society becoming ever more detached from the natural world, it is essential to heed the wisdom of Ralph Waldo Emerson, who once remarked, “In the presence of nature, a wild delight runs through the man, in spite of real sorrows.” By embracing the multitude of benefits that spending time in nature offers, we can cultivate the growth of resilient, content, and well-rounded individuals who prioritize their well-being and exhibit a deep connection to the planet’s well-being.
Let’s inspire and motivate children to venture outdoors, inhale the invigorating freshness of the air, and embark on a journey of discovery amidst the enchanting wonders that the great outdoors holds.
The Google Pixel Fold arrives a little late to the foldable party but, based on my time with the device, it’s a smartphone/tablet combo that mostly delights, and which is sure to earn a place among our ranking of the best Foldable Phones.
From its construction, including its precision hinge, to its high-resolution screens, the Pixel Fold is a well-thought-out Android phone that’s equally at home as a small-screen, but thick, 5.8-inch phone or, unfolded, as a 7.6-inch mini tablet.
The large bezel around the main screen might give pause to some, but it quickly fades into the background, thanks to a responsive, colorful, and multitasking-friendly screen. Even the unavoidable crease down the middle is somewhat less prominent than those on competing foldable phones. And when you fold the Pixel Fold, the two sides meet with nary any visible space between them.
The collection of cameras on board do not disappoint. They can capture lovely landscapes, portraits, macro-like photos (there isn’t a dedicated macro mode), astrophotography, and striking long exposures that use image segmentation to blur motion while keeping other aspects of the scene in focus.
I’m particularly pleased that Google put a 5x optical zoom on this phone. Sure, that’s half of what you get on the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, but it does beat its closest foldable rival, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4.
Google has equipped the Pixel Fold with its Tensor G2 chip (the same one that’s in its Pixel 7 line), a slightly aging piece of silicon that doesn’t beat the competition, but which proved more than powerful enough for every task I threw at it. The Pixel Fold is as at home with web browsing as it is with high-intensity gaming. Plus, the screens’ variable refresh rates keep everything looking smooth. A small nitpick might be, well, the lack of nits. The Pixel Fold’s main screen is noticeably less bright than the Galaxy Z Fold 4’s (the latter boasts more nits), and while I didn’t have any issues on cloudy days, it might struggle a bit in direct sunlight.
Naturally, Android 13 (with five years of promised security updates) is perfectly at home on the Pixel Fold, but so are all the Google apps that Google has optimized for the new platform. Mail, Photos, and more work like a charm on the big screen, and there’s real joy in being able to drag and drop a photo from another app into an email.
Google arguably stumbles a bit when it comes to the pricing. $1,799 / £1,749 is a lot to pay for a single device, especially as other newcomers, like the smaller but quite impressive Motorola Razr Plus, come in at under $1,000 (Google hasn’t announced any plans to release the phone in Australia, but we’ll let you know if and when we get official confirmation either way). My take, though is that you’re essentially getting two premium devices in one here, and Google is asking you to pay for that.
Overall, I truly enjoyed my time with Google’s first folding device. It’s not a tentative or compromised first attempt at the form factor: the Google Pixel Fold makes a clean and emphatic landing in the foldable space.
Google unveiled the Pixel Fold during its May 10 Google I/0 2023 developer conference keynote, at which it also unveiled its mid-range Google Pixel 7a phone, the Google Pixel Tablet and charging speaker dock, and a ton of new AI technology.
You can preorder the Google Pixel Fold now, with shipping set to commence on June 27, although exactly when you’ll be able to get your hands on the phone depends on where you are. The Fold comes in two colors: Porcelain (off-white) and Obsidian (black). My review unit is Obsidian, and I think I prefer it over the white.
If you haven’t already, you should disabuse yourself of the notion that when you buy a foldable you’re buying one device, and so should pay for one device. The Google Pixel Fold is, like the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4, two full-blown devices in one and, as such, it’s very nearly worth the $1,799 / £1,749 price tag.
How do I figure this? There are two screens on Google’s first foldable, one 5.8 inches and the other 7.6 inches, and each one is large enough to operate as a standalone communication, information, gaming, and entertainment platform.
There are more cameras on the Pixel Fold than on the average handset: three on the back, another one on the external screen, and then one more right above the main display.
If you purchased, say, an iPhone 14 Pro ($999 / £1,099 / AU$1,749) and an iPad mini ($499 / £479 / $749), that would cost you about $1,500, or the UK and Australian equivalents. And naturally, you’re paying a premium for more cameras, and that exquisite flexible and hard-to-manufacturer foldable display.
My point is, before you dismiss the Pixel Fold for its hefty price tag, I suggest you consider what you’re actually getting for your money, and what this impressive Android 13 smartphone and tablet can do.
Still, at this price, the Pixel Fold is more than a considered purchase, and I fully understand that – especially if you’re thinking about the 512GB and nearly $2,000 ($1,919 / £1,869) model – the cost will be a considerable issue.
The good news is that there are already Google Pixel Fold trade-in deals that essentially cut the price of the phone in half. Basically, there should be almost no reason to pay full list price for what is a very impressive device.
Google Pixel Fold design
The right form factor for a phone-to-mini-tablet foldable
Feels solid, if a bit heavy
Folds completely flat
Whisper-quiet operation
Big bezel will distress some
Google’s decision to wait out Samsung through four iterations of its foldable devices (and almost five, with the Galaxy Z Fold 5 set to be announced in the next few weeks at the time of writing) turns out to have been a smart move. The Pixel Fold is in many ways what I want all foldables to be.
When folded, its 139.7mm tall by 79.5mm wide by 12.1mm thick frame is like a very thick 5.8-inch smartphone. Unlike the tall and narrow Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4, the dimensions of which, when folded, stretch the definition of a traditional smartphone display, the Pixel Fold and its front screen could almost pass for a standard smartphone; that is as long as you overlook the flat hinge side, which does not match the curved corners on the opposite side.
Plus, if you don’t count the rather prominent camera bump (really a band that runs almost the width of the back of the phone), the Pixel Fold is, at 5.8mm unfolded, slightly thinner than the 6.3mm Galaxy Z Fold.
Even by foldable standards, though, the Pixel Fold is a bit heavy. It weighs 283 grams – that’s 20 grams more than the Galaxy Z Fold 4 and, unsurprisingly, 40 grams heavier than Apple’s current biggest phone, the iPhone 14 Pro Max.
Again, if you don’t appreciate that multi-purpose devices like this are naturally going to be bigger and heavier than standard smartphones, you’re barking up the wrong, er, device tree.
This is a premium phone, with high-end materials like a polished aluminum frame, and Corning Gorilla Glass Victus on both the front screen and the back. The hinge is stainless steel and the entire body is IPX8-rated, which means it’s ready to survive everything from a storm to an accidental drop in the bath (I didn’t submerge the phone but did run it under some water – it survived).
The hinge operation, by the way, is excellent. It’s smooth, whisper-quiet (quieter even than the Z Fold 4, which makes a little crinkling sound when you open and close it), and can open to a full 180 degrees or virtually anywhere in between (to support tabletop and Tent operation).
I opened and closed the phone a lot during my testing time, and came away with the distinct impression of long-term durability.
Aside from the rather wide and tall camera bump, there aren’t many distinctive features on the outside of the Pixel Fold. On the back, below that bump, is a polished version of Google’s distinctive ‘G’. The hinge has no markings at all. Opposite the hinge, on the right edge of the phone when it’s unfolded, are the phone’s two buttons. The power/sleep fingerprint reader (which is effective) is towards the top, and below it is the volume rocker. This is the opposite configuration to the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 and, it took some getting used to – I kept pressing the power button when I meant to adjust the volume, although I’m sure that if I spend enough time with the Pixel Fold, hitting the right button will become second nature.
There are microphone and speaker grilles along the top and bottom edges of the phone. Along the bottom is the USB-C charging port (the foldable ships with a cable and even a USB-3-USB-C adapter, but no charging adapter – it feels like something that should be included at this price). There’s also a physical SIM slot, though the Pixel Fold does support dual SIM and eSIM, too.
A few things stand out when I unfold the Google Pixel Fold. One is that, unless you give it an extra press down on each side, the phone does not automatically unfold completely flat, although this isn’t a big deal, as it’s very easy to nudge it to an essentially flat plain. I remain somewhat surprised by the size of the bezel surrounding the Fold’s flexible main screen. In contrast to the bezel on the Galaxy Z Fold 4 it’s huge; however, once you start using this display, it quickly fades into the background.
There is a reason for the big bezel: it houses the main screen’s 9MP camera. On the Galaxy Z Fold 4, Samsung chose to put a punch hole in the screen, and maybe that was the right call for a slightly large folding screen – I’m not sure.
As I mentioned earlier, the power button doubles as an effective fingerprint reader, and there’s another biometric security option: you can register your face and unlock it with the Cover screen’s camera. Oddly, though, you can’t unfold the Pixel Fold and use that screen’s camera to unlock with your face; it’s a small but annoying omission on Google’s part.
Google Pixel Fold displays
5.8-inch external screen with a normal aspect ratio
Lovely, large flexible display that’s a good fit for all activities
A slightly diminished crease
120Hz variable refresh rate on both screens
One of the best things about Pixel Fold’s two screens is that there is zero trade-off between using just the outer cover screen or the expansive main display.
I love that Google went with a full-width 5.8-inch cover display. That’s considerably shorter than the Galaxy Z Fold 4’s 6.2-inch external display, but it’s also almost a half-inch wider – and I can say without reservation that I prefer the Pixel Fold’s wider external screen. Not only is it easier to navigate, but apps like Instagram and TikTok look a lot better on it. The difference in size is better illustrated when you look at the resolutions – where the Galaxy Z Fold 4’s cover display is 2316 x 904 pixels, the Pixel Fold’s OLED is 2092 x 1080.
It’s a pleasingly bright screen both indoors and out, with a promised 1,200 nits of brightness in typical use (the peak brightness is 1,550 nits), and smooth in operation thanks to an adaptive refresh rate (60Hz to 120Hz). I also like that there’s an always-on display option (you have to dig into the settings to find it as it’s not set up by default).
Overall, the cover screen is the display you’ll most often use when on the go. It’s the perfect viewfinder for the main camera array on the back, and the size is, depending on your hand, basically palm-friendly.
Of course, there’s a reason you’re carrying around all that weight and girth: the large main screen. Unfolded, this is a 7.6-inch tablet-like display covered in ultra-thin flexible glass and a layer of protective plastic. At 2208 x 1840 it’s got just a touch more pixels/resolution than the Galaxy Z Fold 4’s main screen.
I grew to love this screen. Apps like Google Maps, Netflix, and YouTube, and games like Asphalt 9: Legends, and Call of Duty Mobile look fantastic on it. If you happen to start playing Call of Duty on the big screen, then close the Pixel Fold and try to continue on the cover screen, you may notice that the image is distorted. I was able to fix this by closing the game and restarting on the cover screen – it seems like a a bug that Google could fix with a software update.
In a side-by-side comparison, I did find that the Galaxy Z Fold 4’s main screen is a little brighter. It’s worth noting that the Pixel Fold’s main display does not even match the brightness of the cover display; it’s 1,000 nits as standard, with a peak brightness of 1,450 nits. Still, this is something you’d only notice if you had the two phones and screens side-by-side (as I did).
Like the cover display, the main screen supports an adaptive refresh rate of up to 120Hz. It has the same 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio, supports 16 million colors, and offers HDR support (though not HDR10+). it also supports the always-on display.
This being a foldable display, there is a crease that you can both see and feel, but it disappears when you’re using apps, playing games, and watching videos. I did notice that this crease is ever so slightly less prominent than the seam on the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4’s main screen.
Google makes good use of the cover display, and of the device’s folding capabilities. If I fold the phone to roughly 45 degrees and set it up like a tent, I can watch Netflix as a full-screen experience on the cover display. If I unfold the Pixel Fold, the show or movie is automatically switched to the main screen.
I did notice that YouTube is not entirely optimized for the Pixel Fold – when I tried to play a YouTube video in Tent mode, it insisted on playing upside down.
The main screen also has a couple of nifty mid-fold tricks up its sleeve. I can bend it 90 degrees and set the Pixel Fold up in Tabletop mode. With it, I can watch movies, take a selfie, capture perfectly still time-lapse videos, or, as I did on more than one occasion, conduct hands-free Google Meet video meetings. Try doing that with your regular phone and no tripod.
You can also bend the phone a bit further so the main cameras are pointed and the sky and collect tripod-free night photography.
A big screen also means that I have space for not just one, but two apps. The Pixel Fold is a good multitasker that makes running two apps easy. All I have to do is open one app, like Chrome, then sweep up from the bottom to access the app dock, hold down on a second app like the Camera, and then drag it to the left or right side of the screen. You can resize the split of the two screens but, unfortunately, cannot run a third app. Still, it is useful to be able to have a map open at the same time as your camera viewfinder, especially if you’re hiking and want to capture great shots while not getting lost.
Google Pixel Fold cameras
Overall excellent cameras
Backed by powerful Google tools
Long exposure mode is a delight
Google has been widely praised for the cameras on its Pixel phones, and I think the Pixel Fold also earns those accolades.
Its cameras not only take excellent photos across a wide range of styles, they’re complemented by some of the most powerful on-board image-processing magic in the business. I haven’t had this much fun using a smartphone’s cameras in quite a while.
It’s not just the camera app, or the editing I can do post-shot; the entire suite of camera hardware is strong. And while the Pixel Fold doesn’t beat the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 in every aspect, I don’t think anyone will feel cheated by any single lens.
Here’s the full list of cameras:
48MP f/1.7 wide (rear)
10.8MP ultra-wide f/2.2, 121-degree field of view (rear)
10.8MP telephoto 5x optical f/3.05 (rear)
9.5MP f/2.2 (cover)
8MP f/2.0 (above main screen)
By and large, this array matches up pretty well with what’s on the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4. The biggest difference is probably the Pixel Fold’s main display camera, which has double the megapixels of the Z Fold 4’s.
What I really appreciate though is the 5x optical zoom (you get just 3x on the Z Fold 4). I love a good optical zoom. Yes, both devices offer their own form of digitally- and AI-enhanced zoom. The Pixel Fold’s Super Res Zoom (up to 20x) is sort of impressive, but as with most of these digital implementations, the images kind of fall apart if you look too closely. Still, I love having an optical image stabilized (OIS) and electronic image stabilized (EIS) 5x zoom in my pocket.
As you can see from my photo gallery further down the page, the Pixel Fold not only takes sharp and bright images, it also maintains excellent color fidelity. These images all look impressively like the real-world subject; nothing is oversaturated beyond nature’s creation. The cameras let you capture subjects from a distance, and also allow you to get up close and personal, courtesy of the Fold’s approximation of macro photography. To be clear, I can’t really get closer than, say six or seven inches, but the effect is like macro, with a blurred background and a tight, sharp focus on the nearby object (see my yellow flowers).
There are a number of cool onboard tricks that can improve your not-so-awesome photos. Photo Unblur can sharpen photos blurred by your wobbly hands (although the camera is fast enough that I had to work to make a blurry photo for my tests). Magic Eraser is here, and it let me easily select and remove a bunch of commuters from one of my photos, as you can see below. The process of selection and removal is not instantaneous – it’s like the Pixel Fold wants to show you how hard it’s working.
Image 1 of 2
My other favorite feature in the Camera app is Long Exposure. This is not night photography. Instead, it’s a much shorter-term exposure that captures some movement while leaving the rest of the photo sharp. When I took a photo of a flowing brook using this setting (the on-screen instructions ask you to hold still for a second), it kept the surrounding rocks in focus while blurring the flowing water. It did the same thing with my fountain shot: the water is blurred, but the fountain and surrounding detail are sharp. I tried it in the train station, and it turned rushing commuters into streaks while, in the background, a man who stood still was clear as day. Again, the process of creating these effects takes a moment, and I wonder if a newer Tensor chip (the G2 is almost a year old, after all), might make quicker work of these operations.
Image 1 of 5
You can shoot a selfie, even in portrait mode, with the 9MP inside camera or the 8MP one on the cover screen, but Google also makes it possible to shoot selfies with the Pixel Fold’s best camera.
First, you unfold the device and then open the Camera app. Below the ‘switch camera’ icon is an option that lets you switch camera display screens. Once you do that, the cover screen becomes the camera viewfinder and, because the Pixel Fold is open, you’re staring at the rear camera array. It’s not the smoothest process, and it’s basically impossible to hold the device this way with just one hand and take the shot, unless you add one more step and set up the gesture-activated timer mode.
To do so, I had to set the timer for three seconds, and then hold up one hand until a yellow box appeared on screen around it, which initiated the timer. I could then lower my hand, and the Pixel Fold would take a perfect selfie.
Complicated? Sure. Useful? Absolutely.
Virtually all flagship phones offer some form of astrophotography, and the Pixel Fold is no different; however the double act of Nightscape photography and Tabletop mode is something special. I was able to set up the phone with the screen folded but not fully closed, so the main camera was pointed at the night sky, and then fiddle with the on-screen settings to get a perfectly still starscape, without the need to hold the phone and try to stand still for six seconds, or use a tripod.
The shot below was taken with the 5x optical zoom and a six-second exposure.
Camera samples
Image 1 of 18
Google Pixel Fold performance and specs
Packs Google’s aging Tensor G2 chip
Perhaps a step behind the latest Qualcomm Snapdragon
12GB of RAM, starts at 256GB of storage
Inside the Google Pixel Fold is the zippy Google Tensor G2, the same chip that powers the Google Pixel 7. This is a capable and powerful mobile CPU, although with a Tensor G3 expected in a few months (maybe in the Pixel 8) we have to wonder why Google’s first foldable didn’t get what’s set be Google’s most cutting-edge silicon.
In general, though, there’s almost no evidence that the chip is slowing anything down. Every game, app, and web operation I performed was smooth and instantaneous. Photo-editing operations and tricks like Long Exposure took a beat to render, though. Perhaps that’s down to the G2, or maybe that’s how long the likes of Magic Eraser and Long Exposure would take on any mobile platform.
Google pairs the Tensor G2 with a healthy 12GB RAM and its Titan M2 security coprocessor.
Benchmark scores put the Pixel Fold slightly behind the Galaxy Z Fold 4 and its Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while gaming benchmarks, specifically the ones that look at frames per second, put it somewhat behind Qualcomm’s latest chips. However, in my gameplay experience across Asphalt 9: Legends and Call of Duty Mobile, I didn’t notice a difference. There was no stuttering or tearing, and everything looked great and was highly responsive, so much so that I was MVP during my first round of Call of Duty.
This is also a 5G phone, though without a test SIM I wasn’t able to test its cellular operations. It also supports WiFi 6e, which means I had fast and reliable connections at home and in the office.
As for audio performance, there are stereo speakers that can go pretty loud – and immersive, thanks to spatial audio support – without any distortion. The three microphones, meanwhile, are so sensitive that when I barely whispered “Hey, Google…” the phone heard me and awaited my instructions.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Google Pixel Fold specs
Google Pixel Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4
Oppo Find N2 Flip specs
Dimensions (folded):
139.7 x 79.5 x 12.1mm
155.1 x 67.1 x 15.8mm
85.5 x 75.2 x 16.02mm
Dimensions (unfolded):
139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8mm
130.1 x 155.1 x 6.33mm
166.2 x 75.2 x 7.45mm
Weight:
283g
263g
191g
Main display:
7.6 inch (2208 x 1840) OLED
7.6 inch (2176 x 1812) AMOLED
6.8-inch 21:9 (2520 x 1080) 120Hz LTPO E6 AMOLED, protected by UTG
Cover display::
5.8 inches (2092 x 1080) OLED
6.2 inches (2316 x 904) AMOLED
3.26-inch 17:9 (720 x 382) 60Hz AMOLED, protected by Gorilla Glass 5
Chipset:
Google Tensor G2
Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
RAM:
12GB (LPDDR 5)
12GB
8GB (LPDDR5)
Storage:
256GB / 512GB
256GB / 256GB / 1TB
256GB (UFS 3.1)
OS:
Android 13
Android 13
Android 13 w/ ColorOS 13
Primary camera:
48MP, f/1.7
50MP f/2.2
50MP, f/1.8, 23mm, 86° FoV (Sony IMX890)
Ultrawide camera:
10.8MP, f/2.2
12MP f/2.2
8MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112° FoV (Sony IMX355)
Telephoto
10.8MP f/3.05
10MP f/2.4
Front Camera:
9.5MP f/2.2
10MP f/2.2
32MP, f/2.4, 21mm, 90° FoV (Sony IMX709)
Inner Camera
8MP f/2.0
4MP f/1.8
Battery:
4,727mAh
4,400mAh
4,300mAh
Charging:
30W (wired)
25W (wired)
44W (wired)
Colors:
Porcelain, Obsidian
Gray, Phantom Black, and Beige
Astral Black, Moonlit Purple
Google Pixel Fold software
Android 13
Google knows how to fold
Seamless multitasking
Image 1 of 3
What matters here, though, is not the speeds and feeds of this phone but, for me at least, how Google’s first foldable uses Android 13, and the Fold’s small outside and big inside screens, to maximum effect.
Many of Google’s core apps, like Maps, Gmail, Photos, Home, and Drive, have been redesigned for the folding-screen environment (as have some third-party ones like Netflix). Mail, for instance, converts from a single-column experience on the cover screen to a dual column on the main screen that puts your mail list on the left and opens each email in a pane on the right. It’s all smart and, honestly, what you would expect.
Multitasking is a strong suit here. As I mentioned, it’s easy to drag and drop one app to open alongside another on the main screen, although I do wish I could add a third app on top of those two.
When you have two apps open side-by-side you can drag and drop between them. I opened Gmail and Google Photos, and to add a photo to an email I was composing I simply tapped and held my finger on the image until a little thumbnail appeared, then dragged it over to the compose screen on the left. Nothing could be easier.
The best way to describe my overall experience with the Google Pixel Fold software environment is that it was pleasant surprise. Everything looks so good, and works so well together.
Google Pixel Fold battery life
4,727mAh
Laster 15 hours
Supply your own charging adapter
I did what I could to stress-test the Pixel Fold’s ample 4,727mAh battery, pushing screen brightness to max, not letting the screen sleep before 30 minutes had elapsed, and playing action games, watching videos, browsing the web and holding multiple, lengthy video conference calls (colleagues said I sounded good, but looked a little less sharp than I normally do through my MacBook Air (M2) FaceTime camera).
After wirelessly charging the Pixel Fold on my Qi charging base, I grabbed the phone at 7am and used it almost continuously until 10pm when it ran out of juice. I did not, when it prompted me at 10% battery life, let it switch to Extreme Battery Saver mode because that would have paused my apps.
Google Pixel Fold score card
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Attributes
Notes
Rating
Design
Google may have found the sweet spot for tablet-sized foldables
4.5/5
Display
Cover display is shorter than the Galaxy Z Fold 4, but more than makes up for it in width. The main screen is beautiful and the big bezel quickly fades into the background.
4/5
Performance
The Tensor g2 has more than enough performance to satisfy most foldable needs
5/5
Camera
An excellent colleciton of cameras inside and out that take beautiful photos
4/5
Battery
Battery life is solid
3.5/5
Software
Android 13 seems perfectly at home on this dual-display, dual-mode device.
4/5
Value
It’s costly but such is the price of two premium devices in one.
I embarked on an entertaining walking tour through New York’s Central Park with a test device, during which I took lots of photos, and carried out an additional five days of testing with my Google-provided Pixel Fold test unit.
I carried the Fold with me every day, and used it as often as possible, including on the train, where I tethered it to my iPhone 14 Pro. I shot photos in a variety of environments and situations, and edited the photos with available tools on the device.
While I spent a lot of time using productivity and information apps on the Pixel Fold, I have to admit that I spent an almost equal amount of time playing games and watching videos. It’s just such a fun device to use – there’s nothing like having a tablet hidden in your pocket.
We ran GeekBench 6 and other benchmarks on the phone at Future Labs, and I combined that information with my anecdotal performance results.
The following excerpt was sent out from The New York Times’ Meaghan Looram and Clinton Cargill:
We are delighted to welcome Greg Kendall-Ball to the Photo department as a staff editor. He will join the digital team, focused on Live and Express coverage and home screen curation, reporting to Clinton.
Greg began his journalism career writing and photographing features and news for The Abilene Reporter-News in Texas. After four years there, he left to pursue a master’s degree in journalism from the University of Missouri.
Since graduating, he has worked at The Washington Post and Nature, and in the commercial photography world. He became a freelance photo editor for The Times in 2020.
Greg has worked across many desks but has spent most of his time with the International desk, helping in our coverage of the withdrawal from Afghanistan and the fall of Kabul, the assassination of the Haitian president, the U.S. immigration crisis and most recently our coverage of Russia’s war in Ukraine.
doha, qatar: the cultural village foundation, katara announced the winners of its photography competition, which is part of the activities during its katara ramadan 2023. this competition received wide participation from photography enthusiasts and the screening committee chose three winners: muhammad saeed fairouz, in the first place, ali abdul jabbar saif al din, in the second place, and the third place went to muhammad naguib nasr. the first place winner will receive qr15,000; second place, qr10,000; and third place, qr5,000. the competition stipulated that the submitted photo reflect the artistic vision of the subject of the competition, and also among the conditions is that each participant has the right to submit a maximum of three photos, while the institution has the right to use the winning photos in any of its activities, and the participation is considered approval of that. katara’s ramadan programme this year included 23 diverse activities that included cultural, awareness and entertainment activities directed to different age groups of society, the most important of which is the islamic stamps exhibition at the postal museum in building 22 and the fine art and photography exhibition in building 18. wisdom square hosted a ramadan art mural, the creativity square hosted the event of the storyteller’s stories, in addition to the religious events, including lectures and a quran memorisation competition for male and female children at katara mosque. katara also launched a number of competitions and various prizes during its ramadan activities, including the katara prize for arabic poetry, and the katara ramadan competition for the short story, in addition to a number of sports and intellectual tournaments such as the katara popular games championship (kerem and dama) and the katara championship. also included are katara electronic games, katara ramadan beach volleyball championship and the katara international ramadan chess championship.
MENAFN26062023000063011010ID1106502309
Legal Disclaimer: MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
COUDERSPORT, Pa. — Up a winding road that cuts through the Allegheny Plateau, hundreds of amateur astronomers in campers and pickups stream into northern Pennsylvania each spring and summer in search of one thing: stars.
It’s something they can’t get enough of in the halo of light pollution that surrounds most cities. By contrast, Cherry Springs State Park, located about 135 miles northwest of Wilkes-Barre,is one of the very few truly dark sky sites in the entire eastern United States.
Twice a year, in June and September, park officials and local astronomy clubs team up to host “star parties” that draw people from as far away as Florida and Wisconsin. For these amateur astronomers, there’s no replacement for the inky-black skies that reveal what they affectionately refer to as “faint fuzzies” — dim and distant galaxies, star clusters and nebulae.
The weather, however, is always a wild card. Only the third and final night of the June event this year, timed to coincide with the new moon, delivers clear skies. Molly Wakeling is betting that will be enough to capture LDN 1262, a wispy nebula in the constellation Cepheus. She’s hoping to photograph it, something that would be impossible from her home in Dayton, Ohio.
“I do the objects from the dark skies that are hard for me to do from home,” Wakeling says. A quick glance at a dark sky map makes clear why western Ohio is such a challenge for her, and why Cherry Springs is so inviting, even if it means waiting out clouds and rain.
Digital cameras have changed the game
Wakeling is part of a growing trend among amateur stargazers. Traditionally, “visual astronomers” have simply looked through an eyepiece to view objects that are often thousands — or even millions — of light-years away. In recent years, however, sensitive digital cameras have brought amateur astrophotography into its own. Long and multiple exposures collect much more light than the human eye and can then be “stacked” to assemble extraordinary images, as evidenced by Wakeling’s online gallery.
Eric Roth, a past president of the Astronomical Society of Harrisburg, which organizes the annual star party, says 550 people registered for this year’s event, with another 400 on a waitlist. That tops the previous record set in 2022. He says the switch from visual astronomy to astrophotography is “a big-time change” that seems to have really taken off around the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Roth considers himself an old-school, through-the-eyepiece “strictly visual astronomer.” But today “it seems like everybody is going now for astrophotography.”
He doesn’t think that is a bad thing. It’s helping pass the amateur astronomy baton to a new generation. “We’re skewing younger than we used to, which is good,” Roth says. He surmises that it’s because the gadgetry of astrophotography appeals more to a younger demographic.
Trinna Cuellar, 41, lives in New Jersey and has also recently gotten into astrophotography. She talks about her telescope gear the way some people talk about a prized sports car — citing specs and rattling off lingo.
Cuellar has brought her son, Lev, who is almost 11, to Cherry Springs so he can get his first glimpse of “the galaxy we live in” — the Milky Way, she says.
She was first at Cherry Springs as a child and credits the experience with sparking her interest in astronomy. “My first time here, I think I was 7 or 8 years old,” she says. “We came to see the stars, and I was just blown away.”
A few years ago, at the start of the pandemic, she took the leap into astrophotography.
“I love the creative freedom,” Cuellar says. “There’s a lot of flexibility in how you put together that final image.”
“I can actually create something that kind of resembles a Hubble image,” she says, referencing NASA’s famed Hubble Space Telescope.
An escape from light pollution
While the dark skies of Cherry Springs benefit all amateur astronomers, with filters and other workarounds, astrophotographers can mitigate some of the light pollution issues they experience at home. For visual astronomers such as 69-year-old Wayne Petko, though, dark skies are a must.
That’s why he’s been coming to Cherry Springs from his home in New Jersey for the past quarter-century — and not just for star parties but for new moons throughout the summer, when there’s usually 50 to 100 other enthusiasts on the observing field with him, he says.
Petko belongs to the New Jersey Astronomical Association, whose observatory is at a state park situated west of New York City and about 40 milesnorth of Trenton, where “there’s been a gradual upswing in light pollution.”
In fact, Petko’s observation about an upsurge in light pollution is backed by data. A study published earlier this year in the journal Science indicates that on average, the night sky has gotten nearly 10% brighter each year from 2011 to 2022.
That would probably come as no surprise to Stephen Alba, who lives “15 minutes from Newark Airport,” where the stars are hidden by a hazy glow. He, his wife and young son arrived at the Cherry Springs party without a truck full of complicated astronomy gear — just a simple pair of binoculars.
“We want to see the Milky Way,” Alba says, smiling. “We’re just here to experience it.”
Copyright 2023 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.
One of my photography goals this spring was to capture a mother goose on her nest the day the goslings were hatched. It was not an easy task as the nest had to be in a location that was close enough to the road for me to use my vehicle as a blind. This would also allow me to condition the goose to my presence and she would become comfortable with me nearby in the vehicle. The other hard part was that goslings leave the nest about 24 hours after hatching, making timing a critical factor.
Geese usually nest on an “island” in the water, such as a muskrat house, where it is easier to defend and protect from predators. They usually hatch out in 28 days and after one day abandon the nest, never to return.
I spotted three nests near the road, and they were pretty much free of vegetation that would obstruct a good, clear shot. Two of the nests hatched and the geese left before I could try to photograph them.
The third nest was not too far from my house, so I could check it more often. Sometimes I parked nearby for awhile just so the goose would get used to my presence and act naturally. After a time she recognized me and would actually fall asleep with her head up while I was there. The gander also quieted down and quit honking and threatening me whenever I stopped by.
I had just returned from some errands and drove down to check the nest. Bang! There were three cute little yellow goslings next to the mother goose on the nest.
The lighting conditions were not good — I had to shoot into the evening light, which switched from overcast to sun constantly — but this was my chance.
The goslings quickly scooted back under mom for warmth and to snooze. The gander stood guard next to the muskrat house upon which the nest was made, and neither parent showed any alarm at my close presence.
Knowing the goslings would periodically come out from underneath mom and romp around her, I settled in for the wait. My hope was to eventually catch one of them poking his head out from between her body and wing.
As I sat in the comfort of my car (no hard seat or cramped blind today!) I thought about some other good shots I got from this spot while preparing the parent geese for my appearance. One morning as I pulled up to the spot, a little green heron flushed from the cattails and landed in a nearby tree. He stayed long enough to allow me a few good images. The next day he did the same thing and I got better shots.
Another day while “training” the geese, I saw a yellow flash in a bushy red maple tree between the goose nest and me. It was a yellow warbler looking for food in the tree. He darted around, making it almost impossible to get a good shot, but patience won out, eventually.
Then, suddenly, another bird showed up and the yellow warbler chased it off. Lucky for me it came back and turned out to be a yellow-rumped warbler, a bird I had not previous seen. It too eventually gave me a few good shots.
Other birds such as turkey vultures, ospreys, red-winged blackbirds and great blue herons also gave me good shots from this spot.
The morning after I photographed the goslings, I returned to that spot hoping to catch them again before they left, but with better lighting. As it turns out, I did, and I got better shots.
There was one egg left that I could see when the mother goose got up. The three goslings got very active and wanted to explore and so she covered that last egg (which I think was not fertile) and they left the nest that was on the muskrat house.
The parents brought the goslings up to the road edge, by me, to let them pick at insects and dirt. I felt privileged to witness this with the parents acting like I was not there. That is what makes nature photography so worthwhile for those of us who enjoy it and its challenges.
• • •
The snapping turtles are finishing their egg laying process, which has been ongoing since the beginning of the month. I have never seen so many snapping turtles in the Alabama Swamps, and their average size is much bigger, too. I believe the state needs to adjust its management plan on these guys soon or our local waterfowl production is going to take a big hit. Snapping turtles take a lot of young waterfowl and even the adults.
Finding the best cameras for astrophotography means capturing some of the most beautiful photographs possible of our night sky. Here at Space.com, we have explored and reviewed a whole host of models and we’ve rounded up the ones that will help you capture the best astrophotography images.
Above each camera’s description, you’ll find which retailers are selling that model and the best prices to help you narrow down your search. We have chosen a range of versatile cameras that will complement all photography styles, but astrophotography is one thing they do exceptionally well.
They have a broad dynamic range, so you shouldn’t have any problems pulling out the brightest and darkest elements in your shot (also handy for landscape and portrait photography), and they all perform well in unfavorable lighting conditions. They also have excellent ISO performance to reduce unwanted noise. Such capabilities also lend themselves to indoor shooting at events such as weddings and concerts. For more of our favorite generalist cameras, head over to our best cameras for photos and videos guide.
Alongside our picks of the best cameras for astrophotography, we have also created a guide to the best lenses for astrophotography. If you’re really looking for ‘wow factor’ results, pairing your astro-friendly camera with one of the best telescopes can take your astrophotography to the next level. Need to work with a tight budget? We think the Canon EOS R is the best budget model in this list.
Best cameras for astrophotography 2023
Best cameras for astrophotography 2023 ranked
Best for clean astro shots: A dedicated astro camera complemented by zero amp glow
Specifications
Type: Color CMOS astronomy camera
Sensor: 9MP, 1-inch
Lens mount: Scope mounted
ISO range: N/A
Viewfinder size/resolution: N/A
Video capability: 3008 x 3008, 20FPS
Weight: 1.7 lb (800g)
Size: 78mm diameter
Memory card type: N/A
Reasons to buy
+
Zero amp glow
+
80% quantum efficiency
+
High 20FPS frame rate
Reasons to avoid
–
No mono version
–
Square CMOS sensor unusual for some
One of the top-selling points of the ZWO Optical ASI 533 Pro camera is the ability to produce clean, noise-free images without editing software being imperative. With zero amp glow to remove in post-processing, productivity increases, and you can achieve cleaner and sharper images straight out of the camera.
Monochromatic buffs will be disappointed that the ASI533 is only available in the color version. It has 80% Quantum Efficiency and a high frame rate of 20FPS, enabling improved sensitivity and light detection. A 9MP square sensor feels odd; however, with a 1.0e readout nose and 14-bit ADC, it has an excellent dynamic range and is perfect for high-definition, low-noise imaging.
Comparable to most dedicated astro-cameras, the ZWO Optical ASI 533 needs an external power source to run the cooling system — you’ll need this working if you plan on taking very long exposures.
Our ZWO Optical ASI 533 Pro review identified this camera as an affordable, user-friendly, dedicated astro-imaging camera. We struggled to find any negatives, scoring this camera five out of five stars.
Best dedicated color astro camera: This camera produces beautiful high resolution stills with an enormous frame rate
Specifications
Type: Color CMOS astronomy camera
Sensor: 20.1MP, 1-inch
Lens mount: Scope mounted
ISO range: N/A
Viewfinder size/resolution: N/A
Video capability: 5496 x 3672, 19FPS
Weight: 0.9 lb (410g)
Size: 62mm diameter
Memory card type: N/A
Reasons to buy
+
Electronic shutter minimizes camera movement
+
19FPS perfect for solar/lunar photography
+
USB-A 3.0 output
Reasons to avoid
–
Scope mounted only
–
Requires dedicated software
–
Images at 12-bit depth maximum
The compact ZWO Optical ASI 183MC Pro is a fantastic dedicated astrophotography camera. We have identified this full-color camera as one of the best at minimizing noise at long exposures, largely thanks to its onboard cooling system.
At only 0.9 lb (410g) and 62mm in diameter, the ASI 183MC is smaller and lighter than other astro-cameras. This doesn’t mean it is inferior; it boasts 20.48MP, 1.6e read noise, and a whopping 84% Quantum Efficiency peak. Its full-color sensor removes the need for additional RGB filters, minimizing the kit required when shooting. It is a serious astrophotography camera, and you’ll need to have experience with dedicated-astro cameras to make the most of it. Read our in-depth ZWO ASI183MC review to see what can be achieved.
The ZWO Optical ASI 183 can shoot an admirable 19FPS at maximum resolution, perfect for solar or lunar images. The frame rate increases dramatically at a lower resolution and can capture hundreds of frames per second!
The ASI 183 requires a laptop and dedicated software — with a USB-A 3.0 port, data is transferred quickly and efficiently. You’ll also need a telescope and a 12V power supply to operate the cooling system.
Sony A7R IVA
Best for capturing detail in both dark and bright areas and use as a generalist camera
The Sony A7R IVA is the mildly upgraded counterpart of the two-year-older Sony A7R IV. The new model features a 3-inch LCD screen with an increased resolution of 2.36 million compared to the older model’s 1.44 million dots. With the higher resolution, the battery life is slightly hindered, although we still believe it is excellent, and you would be able to shoot a long session without too much worry. Other differences are cosmetic, such as removing the Sony logo from underneath the LCD screen.
As evidenced in the Sony A7R IV review, this camera has exceptional performance and image quality, and the performance has only been improved with the most recent upgrade to the A7R IVA. That said, with only minor upgrades between the A7R IV and the A7R IVA, we suggest saving yourself a few hundred dollars and keeping what you have if you have the former model.
Incredible detail can be captured in both light and dark areas, perfect for astrophotography, and we think, hard to beat. At a high sensitivity of ISO 6400, images can be used without any visible noise; higher than this and more noise is more apparent — as expected.
Tactile buttons are a welcome addition to the camera, particularly when shooting at night while wearing gloves.
With huge 61-megapixel images come equally huge file sizes, your computer must be capable of storing and processing these images without struggling. At the touch of a button, you can also convert the camera to a 26MP APS-C camera with a 1.5x crop factor, enabling easier storage and faster processing.
The A7R IVA doesn’t have a fully articulating screen; however, it does tilt you can still capture stunning images without bending down.
We’ve yet to review the Sony A7R IVA but you can read our full Sony A7R IV review in the meantime
Best rugged option: Great in low light and can tolerate all weather conditions and dust
Specifications
Type: Mirrorless
Sensor: 24.5MP, Full-frame CMOS
Lens mount: Z-mount
ISO range: 100-51,200 (expanded 50-204,800)
Viewfinder size/resolution: 3.68 million dot OLED 0.8x
Video: 4K UHD 60p
Weight: 1.5 lb (675g)
Size: 9.2 x 7.3 x 5.3-inches (134 x 100.5 x 69.5mm)
Memory card slots: 1x CFexpress/XQD, 1x UHS-II SD
Reasons to buy
+
Great for low-light shooting
+
Excellent weather sealing
Reasons to avoid
–
Not worth upgrading from the Z6
–
Lots of competition at a similar or lower price
The Nikon Z6 II is the upgraded version of the Nikon Z6 and if you are upgrading from a beginner model, recording video, or plan to shoot a range of styles in addition to astrophotography, it is worth considering. If you can spare the extra dollars — as we found in our Nikon Z6 II review, this model benefits from a little more refinement.
The Z6 II has kept the features of its predecessor, with some useful additions. The second memory card storage slot takes the pressure off when shooting (as it acts as a backup). It has a faster burst rate and focussing capability, quicker image processing and 4K video capture at 60FPS.
You have more in-camera control over long exposures thanks to the larger range of shutter speeds. The slowest shutter speed is a whopping 900 seconds (15 minutes). With excellent weather sealing, you could even capture images during heavy rain or dust storms if you wanted to!
Best entry-level full-frame: This mirrorless is Canon’s lightest and second-most affordable full-frame mirrorless
Specifications
Type: Mirrorless
Sensor: 24.2MP, Full-frame
Lens mount: RF-mount
ISO range: 100-102,400 (expanded 50-204,800)
Viewfinder size/resolution: 0.7x, 2.36 million dot EVF
Video capability: 4K UHD 60p
Weight: 0.91 lb (414g) (body only; without battery, memory card or body cap)
Size: 5.22 x 3.39 x 2.76-inches (132.5 x 86.1 x 70mm)
Memory card type: 1x SD UHS-II
Reasons to buy
+
Slim body is very portable
+
Great high ISO handling for astro
+
Premium quality Dual Pixel CMOS AF II autofocusing
+
Lightest Canon EOS full-frame mirrorless
Reasons to avoid
–
Awkward single memory card slot
–
Battery life is a bit disappointing
–
Odd button placement for exposure compensation
The second most affordable way into Canon’s full-frame mirrorless ecosystem and the lightest mirrorless Canon body available, the Canon EOS R8 which we reviewed is a surprising victor in the astrophotography realm handling high ISO noise extremely well.
For photographers that want to buy into Canon’s full-frame mirrorless system without forking out for the most expensive models then the Canon EOS R8 is hard to beat. Due to the fact that it’s a full-frame mirrorless camera the entire field of view (FOV) of the RF-mount lenses are usable, rather than APS-C crop sensor bodies that only use a portion of the glass FOV.
The Canon EOS R8 does lack in-body image stabilization (IBIS) but this shouldn’t affect astrophotographers who should use a tripod at all times when taking long exposures of the night sky. Saving money by purchasing this camera works well when photographers are considering purchasing the best lenses for astrophotography which are generally big, fast lenses like the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM or Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM.
Best DSLR overall: A detail-oriented powerhouse with huge stills resolution
Specifications
Type: DSLR
Sensor: 45.4MP, Full-frame
Lens mount: F-mount
ISO range: 64-25,600 (expanded 50-102,400)
Viewfinder size/resolution: Optical, 0.75x mag
Video capability: 4K UHD 30p
Weight: 2.22 lb (915g)
Size: 5.8 x 4.9 x 3.1-inches (146 x 124 x 78.5mm)
Memory card type: 1x SD/SDHC/SDXC and UHS-II, 1x XQD/CF Express
Reasons to buy
+
Huge stills resolution for extra detail
+
Native compatibility with F-mount lens range
+
Reliable and durable weather sealing
Reasons to avoid
–
Bigger and bulkier than mirrorless
–
Low ISO range
–
Optical viewfinder
The Nikon D850 can easily compete with high-end mirrorless models, even though it could now be considered a dated DSLR full-frame camera. With reliable and durable weather sealing it is built to last in all environments and weather conditions, perfect for professionals and enthusiasts alike. The five-year-old EXPEED 5 processor impressively gives a remarkable ISO range (up to 102,400) and fast image processing speed.
The D850 is lightweight and strong — built using an aluminum alloy. With backlit buttons it makes shooting in the dark much easier; we discuss this further in our Nikon D850 review. It has an impressive dynamic range and an interval timer for stunning time-lapses.
The continuous burst frame rate seems low at 9FPS; however, remember that each image is a sizeable 45.7MP.
The D850 can create time-lapse videos and records at 4K30P. When shooting videos, the ‘live’ zebra stripes identify potential exposure issues. You can adjust the settings on the spot rather than encountering issues with exposure during post-processing.
An astrophotographer’s dream, the D850 can autofocus down to -4EV with a Multi-CAM 20K autofocus sensor module with TTL phase detection. With a huge 153 autofocus points, the D850 is perfect for capturing images of stars and other space subjects.
Best low light mirrorless camera: A high dynamic range, excellent noise handling and great battery life
Specifications
Type: Mirrorless
Sensor: 24.2MP, Full-frame
Lens mount: E-mount
ISO range: 50-51,200 (50-204,800 for stills only)
Viewfinder size/resolution: 0.5-inch, 2.35 million dots
Video capability: 4K UHD 30p
Weight: 650g
Size: 5 x 3.78 x 2.91-inches (126.9 x 95.6 x 73.7mm)
Memory card type: 1x SD (UHS-I/II compliant) 1x SD/Multi slot for Memory Stick Duo
Reasons to buy
+
Incredible low-light video performance
+
Good battery life
+
93% AF point coverage
Reasons to avoid
–
Certainly a more expensive option
–
Low stills resolution compared to competition
–
Now outdated
Even at five years old and with two successors, the mirrorless Sony A7 II is still a firm favorite with astrophotographers. Even with a less detailed electronic viewfinder than the newer models, it still offers a useful exposure-ramped view to aid in producing impressive astrophotos.
With a low light autofocus detection of -3EV, it isn’t as sophisticated as other models but still performs well. As discussed in our Sony A7 III review, we were particularly impressed with the high dynamic range — something Sony is well known for and enables you to recover excellent detail from the shadows.
Creating images at a massive ISO 51,200 is seamless with fantastic noise handling and corresponding image results. This can be increased to an eye-watering ISO 204 800 for stills photography. The camera can capture 4K UHD videos at 30FPS.
The Sony A7 III is CIPA-rated well above average for a mirrorless camera of this type and can shoot 710 still shots via the rear LCD monitor on one battery. This camera is slightly more expensive than competitors in its class; however, the A7 III performs well in low light and is adaptable enough to excel in other photography styles.
Best pro-level camera: It can do anything, but it could be overkill for pure astrophotographers
Specifications
Type: Mirrorless
Sensor: 50.1MP, Full-frame
Lens Mount: E-Mount
ISO Range: 100-32,000 (expanded 50-102,400)
Viewfinder size/resolution: 0.64-inch, 9.44M dots
Video Capability: 8K 30P, 4K 120P
Weight: 1.6 lb (726g)
Size: 5.08 x 3.82 x 3.19-inches (149 x 150 x 91mm)
Memory Card Type: 2x CFexpress slots
Reasons to buy
+
Impressive low-light performance
+
Reliable weather-sealing
+
It can do anything
Reasons to avoid
–
Eye-wateringly expensive
–
No fully-articulating screen
To date, the Sony A1 Is Sony’s most expensive full-frame mirrorless camera. With a huge 50.1 MP sensor and an incredibly detailed 9.44 million dot electronic viewfinder, it is capable of stunning 8K video. It is ideal for capturing fantastic images and night sky time-lapses. It has an impressive dynamic range, it’s fully weather sealed and has two memory card slots.
You’ll be looking at an RRP price of around $6500 to purchase this camera — a price that is way out of budget for most non-professional photographers, particularly those who are only interested in shooting astrophotography. Even secondhand, this camera is holding its price. It is a brilliant camera; however, its expense is why it’s further down in the ranks in this guide.
If you’re a professional shooting multiple photography styles, this camera will suit you well for astro shooting alongside other subjects. The 50.1 MP sensor may ring some alarm bells for professionals, as typically higher resolution sensors produce more image noise. Like other Sony cameras, this camera is so good in low light that noise isn’t a problem, especially if you have taken enough calibration frames. In our Sony A1 review, we were very impressed with the astro shots it produced using the interval shooting feature.
Unfortunately, the screen doesn’t fully articulate and is tilted only. For this price bracket, we would expect it to have a fully articulating screen to enable shooting skyward simpler. We don’t feel this is a deal breaker when purchasing this exceptional camera though.
Best for timelapse astrophotography: Easily shoot 4K time-lapses of the night sky
Specifications
Type: DSLR
Sensor: 26.2MP, Full-frame
Lens mount: EF-mount
ISO range: 100-40,000 (expanded 50-102,400)
Viewfinder size/resolution: Optical, 0.71x mag
Video capability: 1080 60p
Weight: 1.68 lbs (765g)
Size: 5.67 x 4.35 x 2.94-inches (144 x 110 x 74mm)
Memory card type: 1x SD, SDHC or SDXC (UHS-I) card
Reasons to buy
+
4K timelapse feature
+
Handy vari-angle touchscreen display
+
A lot of camera for the money
Reasons to avoid
–
No 4K video recording
–
Only one SD memory card slot
–
Low dynamic range a shame
The Canon EOS 6D Mark II is one of the best DSLR Canon cameras for astrophotography. It is perfect for beginners as it is affordable, but is suitable for those wanting to dip their toes into astrophotography. It lacks some of the more contemporary features in mirrorless cameras; however, this full-frame choice is fantastic value for money.
In timelapse mode, this camera can shoot in 4K and is ideal for capturing detailed timelapses of the night sky especially when combined with a star tracker. Our Canon EOS 6D Mark II review identified that it is best to avoid this model if you’re shooting fast action in low light; however, this is not an issue for astrophotography. Image composition is easy with a fully articulating touchscreen display, this is advantageous when shooting skyward.
When capturing regular video footage, this camera does so at full HD 1080p and 60FPS, giving smooth results, but not 4K. The EOS 6D Mark II has a fairly small dynamic range; however, when used alongside enough calibration slides and after picture processing, it can be forgiven.
The Canon EOS 6D Mark II only has a single SD card slot, this may panic those of us who enjoy longer shooting sessions or the safety net of a second SD card. With 102,400 expandable ISO and 26.2MP stills capture, this alleviates the pressure knowing results will be clear and crisp every time.
Best for versatility, this is a great all-round camera for different styles of photography
Video capability: 10-bit 4:2:2 video at 6.2K/30P, 4K/60p webcam mode
Weight: 1.23 lb (557g) with battery
Size: 5.1 x 3.6 x 2.5-inches (130 x 91 x 64mm)
Memory card type: 2 x SD/SDHX/SDHC slots
Reasons to buy
+
Ergonomic design
+
Wide range of lenses
+
Great for traditionalists
Reasons to avoid
–
The screen isn’t fully articulating
–
Dials take getting used to in the dark
The Fujifilm X-T5 is the younger model of the (still excellent) Fujifilm X-T4, and even with the addition of several upgrades, the price point is similar.
Continuing with a stylish timeless design — the Fuji X-T5 has functional on-body dials. As we found in our Fujifilm X-T5 review these dials take some practice but once you’ve got the hang of them, some find them easier to use in the dark than navigating menus. Superseding the X-T4’s 26.1MP with a 40.21 MP CMOS sensor, the X-T5 also has twice the processing speed of its predecessor and greater picture quality.
With an NP-W235 battery, the X-T5 has a CIPA rating of Around 600 shots per charge in everyday performance mode, this can be increased to about 740 shots in economy mode. The battery life is impressive however the extended exposures required to capture the night sky do take their toll on the battery — expect somewhat fewer snaps in reality.
This camera has two SD memory card slots, allowing you to simultaneously shoot JPGs and RAW files, use as a backup card, or simply have double the amount of storage capacity.
This camera is versatile and can be used for other photography styles. With exceptional low-light performance, a high-speed processing engine, and seven stops of in-body image stabilization this camera is an excellent choice for both action and sports photography. It is also a top pick for timelapse photography. You may want to check out our alternative options for this capture style in our best cameras for timelapse videos article.
Best value for money: Relatively old, but still a solid choice for astrophotographers
Specifications
Type: Full-frame mirrorless
Sensor: 30 megapixels
Lens mount: RF (EF and EF-S with adapter)
ISO range: 100-40000
Viewfinder size/resolution: 0.5-inch OLED EVF
Video capability: 4K and 10-bit
Weight: 580g
Size: 135.8 x 98.3 x 84.4mm
Memory card type: SD, SDHC or SDXC (UHS-I) card
Reasons to buy
+
30MP sensor
+
Good value for money
+
Excellent autofocus
Reasons to avoid
–
Button layout could be better
–
Not as rugged as it’s rivals
At four years old, Canon’s first-ever full-frame mirrorless RF system camera is still a firm favorite with astrophotographers.
As discussed in our Canon EOS R review, this camera isn’t designed for robustness or even sleekness in its design. In comparison with the Nikon Z6, it feels fragile. The layout of the buttons could be more intuitive, but you will soon learn the positions with time.
In terms of functionality, mainly when shooting in low light, the performance of the Canon EOS R is above average. With exceptional long-exposure shooting, the camera is perfect for astrophotography. With rapid processing and limited buffer lag, images are processed and stored quickly — perfect for action, sports, or burst-shooting special moments.
With an impressive, large vari-angle touchscreen display, users can set the focus with the touch of a finger — ideal for beginners transitioning up from their smartphones.
Best lightweight option: Bump up the ISO but maintain sharp image quality with fantastic detail
Specifications
Type: Mirrorless
Sensor: 24.2MP, APS-C
Lens mount: E-mount
ISO range: 100-32,000 (expanded 50-102,400)
Viewfinder size/resolution: 2.36 million dots
Video capability: 4K UHD 30p
Weight: 1.11 lb (503g)
Size: 4.72 x 2.64 x 2.72-inches (120 x 67 x 69mm)
Memory card type: 1x SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I/Memory Stick Pro Duo
Reasons to buy
+
Great in low light
+
In-body stabilization
+
Lightweight construction
Reasons to avoid
–
Similarly priced to full frame cameras
–
Same sensor as it’s predecessor
The Sony A660 is a mirrorless camera with as many pixels as a full-frame camera. Sony is well known for producing cameras with excellent ISO performance and this camera is no exception, making it a top choice for astrophotographers or photographers who regularly shoot in low light.
The build quality is excellent and the camera feels rugged and robust, but as mentioned in our Sony A6600 review, it is still compact and lightweight. With nicely pronounced buttons, they are easily accessible whilst wearing gloves and in low-light environments. Backlit buttons would be ideal for future models.
The sensor in the A6600 is the same as its predecessor (the Sony A6500) but its battery has had an upgrade. It is the first APS-C camera from Sony to use the high-performance Z-battery, boasting more than double the capacity of the preceding FW50 battery.
With a tilting screen, composing shots at awkward angles can be tricky compared to a fully articulating one. Aside from astro-friendly features, with fast and highly accurate real-time tracking, the Sony A6600 is also ideal for sports and action photography.
Best for those on a budget: The Z6 gives exceptionally clear images of the night sky
Specifications
Type: Mirrorless
Sensor: 24.5MP, Full-frame
Lens mount: Z-mount
ISO range: 100-51,200 (expanded 50-204,800)
Viewfinder size/resolution: : 0.5-inch, 3.69 million dots
Video capability: 4K UHD 30p
Weight: 1.46 lb (705g)
Size: 5.28 x 3.98 x 2.68-inches (134 x 100.5 x 69.5mm)
Memory card type: 1x SD/SDHC/SDXC and UHS-II, 1x XQD/CF Express
Reasons to buy
+
Low image noise
+
Superb electronic viewfinder
+
Great low light Autofocus
Reasons to avoid
–
Stills resolution is not the highest
–
Limited lens range (without adapter)
–
Superseded by Z6 II
Nikon’s mirrorless Z6 has been superseded by the Nikon Z6 II (featured further up in this guide) and the more recent Z7. Though the specs of the newer additions to the Z family read better, for our money, we think the Z6 is the best model for astrophotography. With a lower resolution, the full-frame sensor in the Z6 produces less noise and has a quicker processing time. Furthermore, the Z6 is much cheaper than its newer alternatives.
With 3.69 million dots, the electronic viewfinder displays detailed and true-to-color images. Though the Z-mount lens range is expanding, it is less established than other models we have discussed. That said, using an FTZ adapter, you can use any of the lenses from Nikon’s huge F-mount lens library.
Our Nikon Z6 review found we could shoot up to ISO 12,800 with very little visible noise in the image. Perfect for evening landscapes, darkened objects, or astrophotography. The image quality only degrades slightly on the maximum and expanded settings.
Best cameras for astrophotography: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best camera for astrophotography?
The ZWO Optical ASI533 Pro is the best dedicated astrophotography camera and the Sony A7R IVA (astronomy version of the Sony A7R IV) is the best mirrorless astrophotography camera because of their unique ability to capture detailed night sky images with minimal image noise.
How much should I spend on an astrophotography camera?
Anywhere from $550 to $3000 depending on the model and type of camera. Dedicated astro cameras are generally cheaper than mirrorless or DSLR models and perform excellently in astrophotography conditions but are otherwise not usable for generalist photography. Mirrorless and DSLR cameras on the other hand can be used for all kinds of photos including portraiture, landscapes, wildlife, sports and more.
Which is best for astro crop sensor or full-frame?
Which is better for astrophotography APS-C or 35mm image sensors?
Full-frame cameras are generally best for astrophotography because they suffer less from high ISO image noise and have the ability to capture a wider dynamic range. However, there are many APS-C models that perform excellently in astrophotography, as can be seen in our guide.
What’s the difference between crop sensor and full-frame?
Full-frame cameras have an image sensor that matches the size of 35mm analog film. APS-C cameras have cropped image sensors that are smaller. Full-frame image sensors are generally around 1.5x bigger than APS-C crop sensors.
A bigger image sensor means more photosites (pixels) can be put on a sensor. However, the additional benefit is that if it uses the same amount of photosites as a crop sensor there is more space on the sensor for larger photosites and more sophisticated connections that help reduce image noise. Image noise is prevalent in astrophotography because of the higher ISO sensitivities (higher sensitivity to light) required when imaging dark skies.
What is the best budget camera for astrophotography?
What’s the best camera for astrophotography beginners?
The ZWO Optical ASI183MC Pro is the best budget dedicated astro camera in our round-up but it is limited to pure astrophotography and in monochromatic (not color).
The best budget mirrorless camera for astrophotography is the Canon EOS R which is the cheapest mirrorless model in our guide but still performs impressively in low light. This camera probably suits beginner astrophotographers better if they are interested in generalist daytime photography as well.
What features should I look for in an astrophotography camera?
Image clarity is critical, and you’ll find that larger sensors with fewer pixels can capture astro shots with minimal image noise. By negating the effects of image noise, we’re able to process imagery more efficiently with better-detailed results.
While not particularly useful for astrophotography, autofocus may still be helpful for those who want to combine night-time shooting with near-twilight landscapes that show the brightest stars, planets, and satellites hanging above a beautiful foreground. A low EV rating on the autofocus ability is crucial for sharp shots in the dark.
Cameras with illuminated buttons will help preserve night vision, especially when combined with a red light headlamp.
What are dedicated astro cameras?
Specialist astrophotography cameras are geared toward photographing the night sky. Long exposures keep circuitry running for long periods and electronic components can heat up during this time, which results in thermal-induced image noise. Since astro cameras have a predisposition to heat up during long exposure shots many models have built-in cooling fans and specific design features to keep the performance of the image capture high; it will likely be larger and heavier and a little noisier as the fans whir while operating.
What lenses should I buy for astrophotography?
Photographers must consider lens choice when choosing a camera for astrophotography. While most major manufacturers have excellent ranges of top-quality glass, not all camera models can accept the full range of lenses due to differences in mount types. Ideally, fast lenses with wide apertures and excellent optical sharpness and clarity are what to look for when shooting astrophotography, take a look at our guide to the best lenses in astrophotography. Pair this with a camera body that handles high ISO and image noise well, and you should be ready to go.
Do I need a filter for my astrophotography camera?
The best light pollution filters for astrophotography are especially important if you’re shooting in an area prone to skyglow. Want to check if you need a light pollution filter? Check out How dark is your night sky? An observer’s guide.
What else will I need to photograph the stars?
A tripod is a must for mirrorless and DSLR cameras and a star tracker will move the camera with the earth’s rotation when taking long exposures using a telephoto zoom lens. Plus, there are many additional camera accessories that will aid night sky photography, with a headlamp that doesn’t disturb night vision being one of the most important.
Dedicated astro cameras will need to be connected to a telescope and will typically sit where the telescope eyepiece normally fits. They may also require a power bank or other external power source to take images.
Should I remove the infrared filter on my camera?
Yes, you can but astrophotographers must be mindful of the noise-handling abilities of each system, as this is an issue often encountered by night and low-light photographers. Be sure to assess the camera’s capacity to block out infrared light before taking a camera apart since this is necessary to capture cosmic objects.
If necessary, a professional can remove the infrared filter after purchase. This is the method we would choose if you are not confident with DIY camera fixes or engineering as it can void warranties.
How do I find the best prices on astrophotography cameras?
The prices in this guide to the best cameras for astrophotography are always up-to-date and reflect the best prices found on the internet. However, we’ve also sourced all the best camera deals: discounts on cameras in one place.
But, if you simply need one of the best mirrorless cameras or best DSLR cameras, we’ve got that covered too.
How we test the best cameras for astrophotography
To guarantee you’re getting honest, up-to-date recommendations on the best cameras to buy here at Space.com we make sure to put every camera through a rigorous review to fully test each product. Each camera is reviewed based on many aspects, from its construction and design, to how well it functions as an optical instrument and its performance in the field.
Each camera is carefully tested by either our expert staff or knowledgeable freelance contributors who know their subject areas in depth. This ensures fair reviewing is backed by personal, hands-on experience with each camera and is judged based on its price point, class and destined use. For example, comparing a 60MP full-frame mirrorless camera to a sleek little crop-sensor DSLR wouldn’t be appropriate, though each camera might be the best-performing product in its own class.
We look at how easy each camera is to operate, whether it contains the latest up-to-date imaging technology, whether the cameras can shoot high-quality stills photos and high-resolution video and also make suggestions if a particular camera would benefit from any additional kit to give you the best viewing experience possible.
With complete editorial independence, Space.com are here to ensure you get the best buying advice on cameras, whether you should purchase an instrument or not, making our buying guides and reviews reliable and transparent.
The Cultural Village Foundation (Katara) yesterday announced the winners of the first three places in the photography competition, dedicated to selecting the best picture for the activities of Katara Ramadan Events 2023. The competition was widely attended by photography enthusiasts. Saeed Mohamed Fayrouz won the first place and earned QR15,000; Ali Abduljabbar Saifaldeen came in second and received a prize of QR10,000; and Mohamed Naguib Nasr came in the third spot and earned QR5,000. The photography competition stipulated that the submitted photo reflect the artistic vision of the subject of the competition, and among the conditions was that each participant has the right to submit a maximum of three photos, while the foundation has the right to use the winning photos in any of its activities and the participation is considered approval of that. The Katara Ramadan Events 2023 included a variety of activities that included cultural activities, awareness-raising, and entertainment events directed to different age groups of society. The most important of these were the Islamic Stamps Exhibition, and the Fine Art and Photography Exhibition. Wisdom Square hosted a Ramadan artistic mural, while Creativity Square hosted a narrator stories. Religious events including lectures and the Holy Qur’an Memorisation Competition for male and female children at the Katara Mosque. Katara also launched several competitions and distributed various awards during its Ramadan activities, including the Katara Prize for Arabic Poetry (Mothers of the Believers), the Katara Short Story Competition, and many sports and intellectual tournaments such as the Katara Traditional Brain Games Competition (Damen and Kerem), Katara Electronic Games Championship, Katara Ramadan Championship Volleyball 2023, and the Katara Ramadan Chess Open 2023, in addition to various activities, and events of the World Theatre Day 2023. (QNA)